Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers

    Thread: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers


    Minyatur (Offline)

    Voice of Unity
    Posts: 5,303
    Threads: 21
    Joined: Dec 2014
    #63
    03-14-2019, 10:26 PM
    (03-14-2019, 09:29 PM)peregrine Wrote:
    (03-14-2019, 08:22 PM)Minyatur Wrote: I'm not sure why you are so concerned with polarity and harvest.

    The thing with the material is that there was a clear intent on the purpose of sharing the Law of One, but the questioning derailed from there for the vast majority of the work. I doubt harvest was what was wanted to be brought,
    I think the questionings on the mechanics of the Universe brought it to that natural aspect of this plane and the means of how it function, from there then are given many tools to distort what is into what it is not. It's not for nothing they say they have served with varying degrees of success in transmitting the Law of One, of Unity, of Singleness to our peoples, this is rarely what people are interested in a material that wants to share just that, but through the mean of answering questions for their own reasons. Then, many people become tormented by things they are confused about, just because they use this material to focus on separation rather than unity.

    Knowledge of the Law of One is the great healer, because truly all is well. Separation is a paradox that yields itself if freely focused.

    These two passages would seem to offer a different point of view.


    LOO Wrote:14.4 ▶ Questioner: I understand [from] previous material that this occurred 75,000 years ago. Then it was our third-density process of evolution began. Can you tell me the history, hitting only the points of development, shall I say, that occurred within this 75,000 years, any particular times or points where the attempts were made to increase the development of this third density?

    Ra: I am Ra. The first attempt to aid your peoples was at the time seven five oh oh oh [75,000]. This attempt seventy-five thousand [75,000] of your years ago has been previously described by us. The next attempt was approximately five eight oh oh oh, fifty-eight thousand [58,000] of your years ago, continuing for a long period in your measurement, with those of Mu as you call this race or mind/body/spirit social complex. The next attempt was long in coming and occurred approximately thirteen thousand [13,000] of your years ago when some intelligent information was offered to those of Atlantis, this being of the same type of healing and crystal working of which we have spoken previously. The next attempt was one one oh oh oh, eleven thousand [11,000], of your years ago. These are approximations as we are not totally able to process your space/time continuum measurement system. This was in what you call Egypt and of this we have also spoken. The same beings which came with us returned approximately three five oh oh [3,500] years later in order to attempt to aid the South American mind/body/spirit social complex once again. However, the pyramids of those so-called cities were not to be used in the appropriate fashion.

    Therefore, this was not pursued further. There was a landing approximately three oh oh oh, three thousand [3,000], of your years ago also in your South America, as you call it. There were a few attempts to aid your peoples approximately two three oh oh [2,300] years ago, this in the area of Egypt. The remaining part of the cycle, we have never been gone from your fifth dimension and have been working in this last minor cycle to prepare for harvest.


    52.9 ▶ Questioner: Well, I would just include the question as to why time of harvest is selected by so many Wanderers as time for incarnation?

    Ra: I am Ra. There are several reasons for incarnation during harvest. They may be divided by the terms self and other-self.  The overriding reason for the offering of these Brothers and Sisters of Sorrow in incarnative states is the possibility of aiding other-selves by the lightening of the planetary consciousness distortions and the probability of offering catalyst to other-selves which will increase the harvest.

    There are two other reasons for choosing this service which have to do with the self.

    The Wanderer, if it remembers and dedicates itself to service, will polarize much more rapidly than is possible in the far more etiolated realms of higher-density catalyst.

    The final reason is within the mind/body/spirit totality or the social memory complex totality which may judge that an entity or members of a societal entity can make use of third-density catalyst to recapitulate a learning/teaching which is adjudged to be less than perfectly balanced. This especially applies to those entering into and proceeding through sixth density wherein the balance between compassion and wisdom is perfected.

    The second passage does not refer to Ra specifically, but the implication is that Ra, as members of the Brothers and Sisters of Sorrow are here for that same reason.

    They state their purpose in the very first question.

    Quote:1.1 ▶ Questioner: It seems members of the Confederation have a specific purpose. Is this true with you, and if so, what is your purpose?

    Ra: I am Ra. We communicate now. We, too, have our place. We are not those of the Love or of the Light. We are those who are of the Law of One. In our vibration the polarities are harmonized, the complexities are simplified, and the paradoxes have their solution. We are one. That is our nature and our purpose.

    We are old upon your planet and have served with varying degrees of success in transmitting the Law of One, of Unity, of Singleness to your peoples. We have walked your earth. We have seen the faces of your peoples. This is not so with many of the entities of the Confederation. We found it was not efficacious. However, we then felt the great responsibility of staying in the capacity of removing the distortions and powers that had been given to the Law of One. We will continue in this until your, shall we say, cycle is appropriately ended. If not this one, then the next. We are not a part of time and, thus, are able to be with you in any of your times.

    Does this give you enough information from which to extract our purpose, my brother?

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 02:51 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by ada - 03-06-2019, 03:08 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 04:17 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by ada - 03-06-2019, 04:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-06-2019, 03:44 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 04:19 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-06-2019, 04:50 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Aaron - 03-06-2019, 08:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 09:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Infinite Unity - 03-06-2019, 11:23 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 11:41 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Infinite Unity - 03-10-2019, 08:18 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 12:13 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-07-2019, 12:39 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 01:15 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-07-2019, 01:58 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Tae - 03-09-2019, 11:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 11:37 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-10-2019, 12:10 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-10-2019, 12:21 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 01:59 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-07-2019, 12:50 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by unity100 - 03-08-2019, 07:01 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by einmal - 04-11-2019, 12:54 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-08-2019, 09:03 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-09-2019, 02:44 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 10:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-09-2019, 07:38 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 11:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-10-2019, 09:54 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-10-2019, 03:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-10-2019, 05:20 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 11:28 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 12:30 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-12-2019, 08:05 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 10:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Tae - 03-12-2019, 05:57 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 11:27 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-13-2019, 01:07 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 11:38 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 12:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 12:53 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 02:44 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 04:06 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 08:27 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Diana - 03-20-2019, 11:45 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-20-2019, 10:03 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-21-2019, 09:20 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 11:13 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-21-2019, 11:25 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 12:17 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-22-2019, 10:17 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Diana - 03-21-2019, 10:59 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 12:10 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-12-2019, 12:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 02:06 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-12-2019, 06:51 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-13-2019, 03:27 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-13-2019, 09:11 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-13-2019, 11:00 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by kristina - 03-13-2019, 10:24 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-13-2019, 01:21 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-13-2019, 03:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 12:15 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 12:32 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 01:20 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 05:49 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 07:01 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 07:46 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 08:22 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-14-2019, 09:29 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 10:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-15-2019, 12:17 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 03:34 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-17-2019, 11:05 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 08:18 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-20-2019, 11:00 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 08:24 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-15-2019, 12:08 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-15-2019, 11:43 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 12:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 09:12 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-15-2019, 06:30 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 06:55 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 08:34 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 09:12 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 10:20 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 06:30 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-16-2019, 01:28 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-17-2019, 01:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 07:57 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-17-2019, 08:56 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 09:09 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-17-2019, 08:19 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-21-2019, 11:09 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cyan - 03-21-2019, 12:22 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-22-2019, 11:37 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-22-2019, 01:10 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by unity100 - 04-11-2019, 02:00 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 04-11-2019, 03:47 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 04-11-2019, 04:21 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by einmal - 04-11-2019, 04:39 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode