Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers

    Thread: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers


    Louisabell (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 1,168
    Threads: 30
    Joined: Nov 2017
    #65
    03-15-2019, 03:34 AM (This post was last modified: 03-15-2019, 03:36 AM by Louisabell.)
    (03-15-2019, 12:17 AM)peregrine Wrote:
    (03-14-2019, 10:26 PM)Minyatur Wrote: They state their purpose in the very first question.

    Yes, and later they state why they came here to teach the LOO, namely, to help with the harvest.  What am I missing?

    They go on at length about how 3d earthlings should meditate and so forth in order to strengthen their polarity to the point where those positively oriented can become able to energize their heart center so as to be able to begin using 4d light so that they can be "harvested," don't they?  Do I have that wrong?

    I'm not sure what you're communicating.  Are you saying that they are coming to 3d entities and advising them to skip over vivifying the heart center and enjoy a 6d lifestyle centering on oneness? 

    I realize this line of inquiry is stretching this thread out of shape just a bit, but I'm curious.  Do I have it all wrong?

      

    I see that Ra's (the channel) purpose was to communicate their truth as clearly as possible, which for them is the Law of One.

    But let's consider the greater context. Why did three wanderers incarnate here at this time to complete the mission of bringing through the channel? They apparently even spent other life-times to prepare for this mission.

    Quote:9.2 ▶ Questioner: Is it possible for you to tell us of anything in our past incarnations, our past experiences before this incarnation?

    Ra: I am Ra. It is possible. However, such information as this is carefully guarded by your mind/body/spirit being totality so that your present space/time experiences will be undiluted.

    Let us scan for harmless material for your beingness. [20-second pause.] I am, in the distortion of desire for your freedom from preconception, able to speak only generally. There have been several times when this group worked and dwelt together. The relationships varied. There is balanced karma, as you call it; each thus the teacher of each. The work has involved healing, understanding the uses of the earth energy, and work in aid of civilizations which called just as your sphere has done and we have come. This ends the material which we consider harmless.

    12.32 ▶ Questioner: [Is it] possible for you to tell us if any of the three of us are and have been Wanderers?

    Ra: I am Ra. In scanning each of the mind/body/spirit complexes present, we find an already complete assurance of this occurrence and, therefore, find no harm in recapitulating this occurrence. Each of those present are Wanderers pursuing a mission, if you will.

    I think Ra made it pretty clear that the reason wanderers are incarnating here at this time is to help with the harvest of 3d peoples into 4d. And yet, you have the below statement...

    Quote:36.24 Ra: I am Ra. We can approximate the percentage of those penetrating intelligently their status. This is between eight and one-half and nine and three-quarters percent. There is a larger percentile group of those who have a fairly well defined, shall we say, symptomology indicating to them that they are not of this, shall we say, “insanity.” This amounts to a bit over fifty percent of the remainder. Nearly one-third of the remainder are aware that something about them is different, so you see there are many gradations of awakening to the knowledge of being a Wanderer. We may add that it is to the middle and first of these groups that this information will, shall we say, make sense.

    So I have concluded that the main reason of the Ra material is to act as a guide/user manual for wanderers (and some 3d souls further along), to speak to their deep memory and awaken what they already know. In this way wanderers can (relatively) quickly activate green ray, making them positive harvestable and capable of tending to 3d souls in order to aid in planetary harvest.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 02:51 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by ada - 03-06-2019, 03:08 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 04:17 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by ada - 03-06-2019, 04:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-06-2019, 03:44 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 04:19 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-06-2019, 04:50 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Aaron - 03-06-2019, 08:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 09:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Infinite Unity - 03-06-2019, 11:23 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 11:41 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Infinite Unity - 03-10-2019, 08:18 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 12:13 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-07-2019, 12:39 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 01:15 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-07-2019, 01:58 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Tae - 03-09-2019, 11:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 11:37 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-10-2019, 12:10 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-10-2019, 12:21 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 01:59 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-07-2019, 12:50 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by unity100 - 03-08-2019, 07:01 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by einmal - 04-11-2019, 12:54 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-08-2019, 09:03 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-09-2019, 02:44 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 10:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-09-2019, 07:38 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 11:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-10-2019, 09:54 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-10-2019, 03:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-10-2019, 05:20 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 11:28 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 12:30 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-12-2019, 08:05 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 10:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Tae - 03-12-2019, 05:57 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 11:27 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-13-2019, 01:07 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 11:38 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 12:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 12:53 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 02:44 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 04:06 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 08:27 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Diana - 03-20-2019, 11:45 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-20-2019, 10:03 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-21-2019, 09:20 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 11:13 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-21-2019, 11:25 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 12:17 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-22-2019, 10:17 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Diana - 03-21-2019, 10:59 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 12:10 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-12-2019, 12:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 02:06 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-12-2019, 06:51 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-13-2019, 03:27 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-13-2019, 09:11 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-13-2019, 11:00 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by kristina - 03-13-2019, 10:24 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-13-2019, 01:21 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-13-2019, 03:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 12:15 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 12:32 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 01:20 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 05:49 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 07:01 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 07:46 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 08:22 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-14-2019, 09:29 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 10:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-15-2019, 12:17 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 03:34 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-17-2019, 11:05 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 08:18 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-20-2019, 11:00 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 08:24 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-15-2019, 12:08 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-15-2019, 11:43 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 12:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 09:12 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-15-2019, 06:30 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 06:55 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 08:34 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 09:12 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 10:20 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 06:30 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-16-2019, 01:28 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-17-2019, 01:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 07:57 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-17-2019, 08:56 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 09:09 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-17-2019, 08:19 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-21-2019, 11:09 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cyan - 03-21-2019, 12:22 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-22-2019, 11:37 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-22-2019, 01:10 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by unity100 - 04-11-2019, 02:00 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 04-11-2019, 03:47 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 04-11-2019, 04:21 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by einmal - 04-11-2019, 04:39 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode