Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers

    Thread: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers


    Louisabell (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 1,168
    Threads: 30
    Joined: Nov 2017
    #75
    03-15-2019, 06:30 PM
    (03-15-2019, 10:20 AM)Minyatur Wrote:
    (03-15-2019, 09:12 AM)Louisabell Wrote:
    (03-15-2019, 08:34 AM)Minyatur Wrote:
    (03-15-2019, 06:55 AM)Louisabell Wrote: I don't think anyone can get solid proof of being a wanderer.

    Confusion is an effect of being veiled and the veil is semi-permeable, so there's many things you can pierce the forgetting and gain knowledge of in your seekings.

    I agree to an extent. There's a lot of knowledge I inuit that I work with. However, I like to be very sure of what I absolutely know as fact and what information cannot be objectively validated, even if I find this information useful or likely to be true. I have found that keeping this disciplined grounding approach to be beneficial in balancing an overactive indigo (my fault for overactivating it in the first place).

    In my opinion, knowledge that one is a wanderer is transient information. We are all human now, through and through.

    I agree the information is transient, are we not all the things afterall?

    The idea should not be a tool to separate, but can still be an effective tool in seeking to know oneself. The most powerful, beautiful and real experiences I've had all related to seeing clearly my own nature as spirit and Creator. Because while I am a human with a mind and a body, the spirit portion of myself is where the magic really lies.

    I found this bit I had forgot that touches how I see it:


    Quote:The forgetting process can be penetrated to the extent of the Wanderer remembering what it is and why it is upon the planetary sphere.

    I'd say in my experience, to remember what you are, is the effective and balanced approach. The purpose then is why what you are is where it is. In my case my seeking was driven by pure curiosity to know what I am, what others are and what everything is and I found that to be in alignment with the Octave and opening many doors.

    Indigo understandings pulled from violet are based in unity consciousness, not as sentiment, but as self evident. I know myself to be a microcosm of infinity. There is no limit to my consciousness. Everything I perceive, I am, because it is I that have projected it and given it life in my mind's eyes. As time progresses, my perceptions only become more subtle in nature. I am as yet to find out if there are any limits to this. I have found all catalyst in my life to be acted upon love, making me an embodiment of love. This is what I know myself to be.

    Details such as if one is a wanderer or past lives or pre-incarnative missions are well protected as to not infringe on the freewill experienced in the incarnation. This information can be inuited, but that is not the same as knowing beyond all doubt. Doubt is important in strengthening faith.

    Let me put it another way. I act as though I am a wanderer because my faith inspires me to do so. I do not act as though I know I am a wanderer because I would not be so bold. I try not to place limits on my intuition. Think of the polarity that believing in something brings. When x and y cannot co-exist, believing in x means that you believe y is impossible. So when one chooses to believe in something as absolute fact, think of what other possibilities you are now choosing to exclude. This only narrows one's intuitive potential.

    It is uncomfortable not to know. I have spent a lot of time and energy resisting this, to no avail. But through my intense struggles I have come to accept this.

    Quote:16.39 ▶ Questioner: I am assuming it is not necessary for an individual to understand the Law of One to go from third to fourth density. Is this correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. It is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. Understanding is not of this density.

    I hope you have come to see me, and perhaps learn a little about who I am and how I see the world.
    [+] The following 3 members thanked thanked Louisabell for this post:3 members thanked Louisabell for this post
      • Minyatur, hounsic, flofrog
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 02:51 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by ada - 03-06-2019, 03:08 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 04:17 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by ada - 03-06-2019, 04:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-06-2019, 03:44 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 04:19 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-06-2019, 04:50 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Aaron - 03-06-2019, 08:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 09:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Infinite Unity - 03-06-2019, 11:23 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-06-2019, 11:41 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Infinite Unity - 03-10-2019, 08:18 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 12:13 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-07-2019, 12:39 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 01:15 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-07-2019, 01:58 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Tae - 03-09-2019, 11:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 11:37 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-10-2019, 12:10 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-10-2019, 12:21 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-07-2019, 01:59 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-07-2019, 12:50 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by unity100 - 03-08-2019, 07:01 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by einmal - 04-11-2019, 12:54 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-08-2019, 09:03 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-09-2019, 02:44 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 10:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-09-2019, 07:38 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-09-2019, 11:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-10-2019, 09:54 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-10-2019, 03:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-10-2019, 05:20 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 11:28 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 12:30 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-12-2019, 08:05 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 10:55 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Tae - 03-12-2019, 05:57 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 11:27 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-13-2019, 01:07 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 11:38 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 12:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 12:53 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 02:44 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 04:06 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-12-2019, 08:27 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Diana - 03-20-2019, 11:45 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-20-2019, 10:03 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-21-2019, 09:20 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 11:13 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-21-2019, 11:25 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 12:17 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-22-2019, 10:17 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Diana - 03-21-2019, 10:59 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-21-2019, 12:10 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-12-2019, 12:59 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-12-2019, 02:06 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-12-2019, 06:51 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-13-2019, 03:27 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-13-2019, 09:11 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-13-2019, 11:00 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by kristina - 03-13-2019, 10:24 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-13-2019, 01:21 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-13-2019, 03:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 12:15 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 12:32 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 01:20 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 05:49 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-14-2019, 07:01 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 07:46 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 08:22 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-14-2019, 09:29 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-14-2019, 10:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-15-2019, 12:17 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 03:34 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-17-2019, 11:05 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 08:18 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-20-2019, 11:00 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 08:24 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Sacred Fool - 03-15-2019, 12:08 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by redchartreuse - 03-15-2019, 11:43 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 12:26 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-14-2019, 09:12 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-15-2019, 06:30 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 06:55 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 08:34 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 09:12 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Minyatur - 03-15-2019, 10:20 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-15-2019, 06:30 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-16-2019, 01:28 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-17-2019, 01:28 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 07:57 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 03-17-2019, 08:56 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Louisabell - 03-17-2019, 09:09 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Glow - 03-17-2019, 08:19 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-21-2019, 11:09 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cyan - 03-21-2019, 12:22 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by Cainite - 03-22-2019, 11:37 AM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 03-22-2019, 01:10 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by unity100 - 04-11-2019, 02:00 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by flofrog - 04-11-2019, 03:47 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by AnthroHeart - 04-11-2019, 04:21 PM
    RE: Session 89 - Two Negatively Polarizing Wanderers - by einmal - 04-11-2019, 04:39 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode