Feminism is about a 5 year old, thought.

[Infinite]

I agree with you however you are not saying anything that I have not said.

So, you agree that feminism is a good thing, right? Good.

On Economic Policy, here is what it says for right wing

Lower taxes; less regulation on businesses; reduced government spending; balanced budget.

Is that service to self?

That's a complex discussion because the focus of the thread is feminism. But, I suggest you search the origins of ultra liberalism ( Milton Friedman, Mises, etc.) and on which context these politicians was implemented. A suggestion is watch this documentary:



Ultraliberalism is a try of create a hierachy on the society. They wants  a "minimal state" where the law of jungle is the main law. If the state is removed from your function of wealth redistribution the strongest will stand out and the poor become more poor. That's the problem of that ideology. Without the welfare state, the poorest people will have difficult lives, which will reduce the probability of the activation of the energy centers and the seek of the Law of One.

If you don't want pay taxes, you don't want share something to others. It's not a judgment. I'm just saying as the things are.

The capitalism is a problem in itself. It stimulates selfishness and money accumulation above the quality of life and the environment integrity. It's a system of a orange/yellow manifestation (because green-ray energy is about see everyone as one and free sharing). If you stimulate the people to think in make part of the top of hierarchy, you will push them away from green-ray perspective.

However, on this moment, I defend the social-democracy, a more humanized capitalism. But, if you think the capitalism is beautiful and a STO perspective, I suggest analyse that data:

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-35339475

Oppose government-provided universal healthcare and the Affordable Care Act. Favor competition to Medicare from private insurance companies; oppose Medicaid expansion.

Is that service to self? It's not all that it seems because the ACA is socialism and I can tell you from my friends experience that this system is STS. He's a staunch Democrat too. But he knows from experience that he's paying into the ACA, he gets the basic services that he doesn't even need, meanwhile a bigger family, just because they have a family, get premium and better/more services then he does while PAYING THE SAME COST. How is that not service to self? It's government mandated that you HAVE to pay into the system. So these people are forcing people like my friend (who is single and single household) to pay into the system so that other people can benefit off of him.

Well, I'm not from USA so I don't know in details the politics of this country.  But, based in my studies, the USA is the most capitalist country on the world today. Makes no any sense think in socialism on USA. You probably is talking about social-democracy.

See, countries as Norway, Sweden, Finland, etc. are countries that prometes welfare state and the people of these countries live much more happy then the people of others countries on the world.

About healthcare, watching a documetary about the U.S. health care system, even the health care system from my underdeveloped country is better. Perhaps the problem is not the system in itself, but the manner on it is implemented in USA. That's the documentary:



Lastly, just analyze that image and the "values" of both side and realise what side is more close to Orion's ideology:



An unequal society. A racist society. A chauvinistic society. A fascist society. A society where the wealth of richest 1% equal to other 99%. The  Confederation has values close to that society?