The unconditional love myth, as described by Donovan Sharpe

[Glow]

@Relaxo

Just caught this part: "I'll add in here - often people who wanted to partner with me - I didn't want to partner with; even though they were attractive and good people.
The person I was looking for may not be incarnate. I don't know."

And then you go onto mention you previously used to have lovers in your life. My guess is this was when you were young.

Donovan Sharpe and other red-pilled commentators cover this one rather extensively.

It seems as you got older, the people that still wanted to partner with you were "attractive" but not sexually arousing, so you noped away from them, despite the fact that they were "attractive and good people". I'm going to guess they were nice guys, but not sexually appealing ones. In other words: betas. They were not the people you would have taken on as "lovers" when you were younger. And nobody you would have taken on as a "lover" seems to want to partner up and commit with you, now that you've hit what is termed in the red pill community as "The Wall" Another term that probably elicits a *lol* or *mentally vomits* from you but nonetheless objectively describes a real life phenomenon that you are no exception to. "Maybe the person I was looking for may not be incarnate" No, they're incarnate, but they're looking for younger women. This is what I mean when I talk about a "mating market"  Yet for some reason, the thought makes you "mentally vomit" even though I am seeing CLEAR SIGNS of a mating market playing out in your statements.

As for marrying yourself, this is making necessity a virtue, but I'm beginning to think there's still something to it. Hey, if it makes you happy, go for it.

"you DON'T get to tell me who I am. SIMPLE." Calling you a liberal isn't defining WHO you are, but objectively, WHAT you are. You are left wing, as is clearly evidenced in your posts. And have you not been telling me what you think I am in your posts? I don't see why you get to define me, but nobody gets to define you.

EP slow down. You are really talking out of your a$$ right now making assumptions based on bad information about someone you do not know.

She hasn't hit a wall. She like myself would never be with a man who sought "younger women" do you know why?
It is because men who are led based on such criteria would not match me as a mate anyways as they are still functioning from lower consciousness levels. I would not relate to them harmoniously mentally/emotionally/spiritually so I would not want them physically. There would be no partnership in all levels which is what I seek.

Even my husband doesn't understand men like that. He calls them monkeys because they are behaving from lower ray like an animal. Once you lift up to higher awareness the lower rays come with you. Your sexuality becomes linked to deeper connection to another, simple things like the exterior of a person isn't enough there needs to be connection on all levels.

There also isn't a wall my own mother as an example. Married a wonderful man at 58 same age as she, he had a really wonderful heart, treated her well, a spiritual man, they had nearly a decade together happily. He died unfortunately and now 5 years later at 72 another friendship has blossomed into romance with a man who is again her own age. They are like teenagers. Really happy.

Women don't shrivel up and become unmarketable like redpill men like to believe. I am 42 and get hit on all the time. Like Relax says though I wouldn't date any of them. I have only met 2 men in my whole life I had interest in on that mate level because we match well in much deeper ways. Friends first.Still love them both by the way. The real stuff doesn't fade.

It is amazing to me you went from doing all sorts of meditations and working to nurture yourself and heal and some how you ended up watching redpill propaganda. That is quite a direction change. It will not lead you where you wish to go if that is happiness.

I know many men(rich clients) who have checked all the boxes money, looks, ability to relate to people, friendly even but they followed the old fashioned male prescribed checklist never really giving much thought to heart. Now they have all the stuff. Property, family, children, all the expensive toys they could want. Yes even younger superficial women who would take them as a mate to benefit from there wealth. Some even have the 30 year younger girlfriend using them for their money.

Are they happy? they tell me no. Actually they generally spew their broken soul at me, showing how hollow and empty their hearts are when I am trying to just be polite and work. They puff up their chests to others and act like its all good then they tell me the truth.

They are not happy they don't know why. They feel empty. It was not the answer but they have no way out now, can't change direction, people depend on them. Guess what they all want. Real love. You wont find it following the old redpill way. It doesn't go there.

More specifically 2 were talking with me in unison several weeks ago. I've never had 2 crsck so hard that they were willing to breakdown and talk to me with another male present but they both were like sad broken little boys. Both wealthy and retired at 50 and they were practically sobbing talking about romantic love. I gave it to them straight. If a woman wants you because of your money or looks or any other superficial thing. They don't want you. They want that superficial thing.

Really I don't know why men keep promoting this bs.
It reminded me of a movie coming to america. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coming_to_America Eddie Murphy was the lead. It came out in 1988 and the premise was clear where a rich prince pretends to be a poor son of goat herders so he could meet someone who loves him for him. Not his wealth.

How did that obvious truth not catch on. It's the real deal. If someone loves you for anything you could lose, it never was love. Hollow.
Waste.