Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Extreme negative bias in intro sociology

    Thread: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology


    unity100 (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 4,502
    Threads: 152
    Joined: May 2010
    #14
    01-14-2011, 06:55 AM (This post was last modified: 01-14-2011, 07:27 AM by unity100.)
    (01-13-2011, 10:52 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Communism failed, socialism is failing. That money-less Star-Trek society sounds great, but it's hollow. Remember, the very nature of 3d is separation (from self) of some kind.

    communism failed ? how so ?

    socialism failing ? how ?

    Quote:Remember there is not only a problem with wealth distribution, but also a problem with wealth creation. We can certainly each encourage opportunity growth by merely realizing that we are an integral part of a larger society.

    the problem with wealth distribution, is the problem that underlies the society. wealth is power, and its unequal distribution eventually nullifies the equal distribution of votes in democratic political side of the societal life. when you need money to get elected, the ones with the money or money backing get elected.

    Quote:
    200 Years of Global Growth in 4 Minutes

    that presentation was criticized for excessive optimism. not only that, but it also ignores the human aspect of society in that it accounts for growth of economies, however it doesnt analyze how the wealth is distributed and used for what ends at all. not to mention that, it takes a lot of the socialist countries in europe into its example, however even if unintentionally, ends up portraying their success as proof of the existing system.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=human+dev...=firefox-a

    this would be a more proper evaluation index.
    (01-13-2011, 11:10 PM)zenmaster Wrote:
    (01-13-2011, 10:58 PM)turtledude23 Wrote: Given how Ra described 3rd density Venus we didn't need any of the horrible history we've had on this planet, it's just disgusting.
    An homogeneous population (i.e. lack of transplants - confused or otherwise), abundant resources, and temperate climate, for example, go a long way towards alleviating potential survival concerns and competition pressure. After survival concerns are addressed, there tends to be the leisure time to philosophize and harmonize.

    remember that the 200 year wanderer wave had incarnated for that very purpose. for bringing technology and methods to give free time from survival to people. this had lead to the age of enlightenment and age of science. these are, now, however being given as proofs of the success of the current system, as if the system was what brought them about. but, we know better due to Ra material.

    moreover, similarly too, the alleged successes of the system in lifting the minimum point of comfort compared to middle ages is also attributed to the system. whereas, it actually didnt matter what kind of system a civilization had, as long as wanderers such as these incarnated to give technology and information proliferated. its not the first time either, it happened in atlantis here too.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by jivatman - 01-13-2011, 12:47 AM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by turtledude23 - 01-13-2011, 02:04 AM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by Lorna - 01-13-2011, 05:14 AM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by Phoenix - 01-13-2011, 05:11 AM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by unity100 - 01-13-2011, 09:17 AM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by Shemaya - 01-13-2011, 04:45 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by zenmaster - 01-13-2011, 06:24 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by unity100 - 01-13-2011, 07:16 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by zenmaster - 01-13-2011, 08:45 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by unity100 - 01-13-2011, 09:14 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by zenmaster - 01-13-2011, 10:52 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by unity100 - 01-14-2011, 06:55 AM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by turtledude23 - 01-14-2011, 12:48 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by unity100 - 01-14-2011, 03:16 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by turtledude23 - 01-13-2011, 10:58 PM
    RE: Extreme negative bias in intro sociology - by zenmaster - 01-13-2011, 11:10 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode