Scientific validation of Law of One series

[Derek]

Now I am not a geek and have a slight interest in scientific research, but still "scientific proof" is proof beyond any doubt. It is something that I can touch, feel and see. If there is not then it must be some machine that can "transform" the invisible to visible. For instance we can't hear radio waves, but our radio "can". It has a receiver that can transform radio waves into the sound complexies that my ears can perceive.

Maybe it is not what you meant, Derek, but proof of vital energies, higher densities and global weather changes are not the real proof of Law of One. Of course there are higher densities as some particles are more dense or compact in their structure than others. For instance the Venus atmosphere is more dense then our own because it contains particles that are more dense in its structure, carbone dioxide. Global weather changes do occur now and then. Last time it was during WW II. Winters were particular hard in years 1942-1943. Then there are sunstorms that have cycles of 11 years and some of these cycles are perticular powerful. Last time this kind of cycle occured was in 1958 when you could see northern lights all the way to Mexico. Next time it is going to occur - guess when? 2013.

No, scientific proof of Law of One will only exist when Ra actually will physically descend on this Earth on more time. I don't want to desillusion you, but it is a great strugle for me to "take it on faith". I don't have any other choice than to take it on faith since there is no proof that Ra actually exists, but I can't live in any other way. So it is all about the faith. Because you see, even if you do remember something, how do you know that it is not your brain that producing a fake memory for you to feel good? Maybe some scientists in 100 years or so will find a gene that are specially representative in caucasian race giving what would be called "Wanderer's Syndrome"?

It will never be that simple I'm afraid that we can scientifically prove existence of Ra and therefore what they teach/learn. And even if they would exist, how would you know what they say/said is true? Maybe they are just fooling you around. Therefore "take what resonates with you" parts. Until they descend in front of me, remove the veil completly and I would scream "brooooothers" it will always be about the Faith.

Sorry if I sounded a bit negative. It is sensitive matter to me right now since I am trying to practice Law of One in every day life without any physical/scientific evidence or proof of it.

Hi Ankh,
I can certainly understand your struggle, and I did not want to imply that "the Law of One" or "Ra" could be proven. Only that certain concepts that are brought up in the Law of One series could be. There are many metaphysical concepts in the Law of One that cannot be proven, and must be taken on faith. Some though, can certainly be proven.

Vital Energy, for example can be measured in the laboratory. The Russians have been doing all kinds of scientific experiments with this energy (which they call "torsion fields") for 100 years and published thousands and thousands of scientific papers. We can also prove that pyramids harness this energy and result in things such as a dramatic increase in crop yields, oil production, healing etc and decreases in violent weather, crime etc.

Of course there was a very detailed discussion of Larsionian physics in (I believe) the second book of the Law of One. The cycle I was referring to was actually the precession of the equinoxes which occurs every 25,000 years and is part of nearly every ancient cultures mythology. We cannot prove "the Law of One", but we can prove that we are all part of a unified field of energy that unites all matter and concioussness in the universe.

The overall story of the Law of One, Logos, Creation etc must be taken on faith though.

Many Blessings