01-20-2011, 12:04 AM
Not that they're not interesting or don't have value or merit to me (my opinion). I can enjoy reading the material for what it is and appreciate his efforts. I was particularly addressing the claim that it contains scientific proof. It simply does not, of course. Sure, he might claim that his presentation supports an intuitive idea that he imagines. But that is not how a rigorous scientific discovery process works.
I've been following David's work since his first posts on the internet, and have read the Convergence material. My criticism would be the hyper-intuitive approach of presenting tenuous connections to disparate things. And most of that done to support his unique confirmation-bias reality. I wonder how he and his followers will react to reality after 2012.
I've been following David's work since his first posts on the internet, and have read the Convergence material. My criticism would be the hyper-intuitive approach of presenting tenuous connections to disparate things. And most of that done to support his unique confirmation-bias reality. I wonder how he and his followers will react to reality after 2012.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)