05-15-2020, 05:01 PM
(05-15-2020, 04:05 PM)Navaratna Wrote: Something about the Law of One and Mccarty's commentary on it which doesn't make much sense to me is how the Tarot he said in recent interviews is something he wanted to remove the astrological symbolism from.
Uh...what? That to me shows how on a slight level, he alone didn't understand some underlying data he was channeling.
I don't know if you're read the Ra Material, but there are many times when the Questioner inquires about items like a group of stars and is told that these were superfluous decorations added later by another people and were not essential to the meaning encoded in the Tarot symbolism. Jim McCarty's desire, as I understand it, is simply to strip the Tarot figures down to their essential elements because, after all, those things are confusing enough as it is without people having to puzzle over tangential elements.