06-08-2020, 06:06 PM
This thread is making me realize I need to give the books another read through.
In the mean time since you all recently read this in context.
By calling the photon a being couldn’t that be other than a 3D being or is it specified?
By being the simplest we could call that the least distorted so it potentially could be on either end of the spectrum. Towards return to oneness we become more light filled. What is more light filled than a being that is light itself? Also as one leaves the density of oneness one would gradually get less and less light filled or more distorted through the separation process.
I will get my books out tonight and look myself but I’m curious others perspective.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful to have a Carla, Jim and Don available to provide a reliable channel now.
I sure could use their and Ra’s awareness of where we are now.
In the mean time since you all recently read this in context.
By calling the photon a being couldn’t that be other than a 3D being or is it specified?
By being the simplest we could call that the least distorted so it potentially could be on either end of the spectrum. Towards return to oneness we become more light filled. What is more light filled than a being that is light itself? Also as one leaves the density of oneness one would gradually get less and less light filled or more distorted through the separation process.
I will get my books out tonight and look myself but I’m curious others perspective.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful to have a Carla, Jim and Don available to provide a reliable channel now.
I sure could use their and Ra’s awareness of where we are now.