01-27-2011, 06:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-27-2011, 06:27 PM by Steppingfeet.)
Nabil, in response to your question, "If all are one, can we justify our vilification of others?", I would contend that we may "justify" any and all actions using our home-cooked rational.
Whether others agree with our justification is a different matter entirely.
The question I believe you intend to ask is, "To what extent does vilification distort the Law of One?" Or perhaps, "Is the act of vilification representative of the Law of One?"
To which I have this quote from the Law of One to offer for your consideration:
http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?ses...stion_id=4
Specifically, "We spoke to one who heard and understood and was in a position to decree the Law of One. However, the priests and peoples of that era quickly distorted our message, robbing it of the, shall we say, compassion with which unity is informed by its very nature. Since it contains all, it cannot abhor any."
This inability to "abhor" anything within creation is not an emotional acceptance, per se, though it may manifest as such, but is on a level provocatively expressed in the analogy of the mirror accepting (or not abhoring) that which passes before it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
And Jeremy, quick comment on your post. You said about the Law of One material that "[it] is so interesting that one could view it as more complete "map" than it actually is..."
I can see the evolution of your thought in this regard.
The Asc2k guidelines that you authored (which we used as a base to create the Bring4th guidelines) contained a statement along the lines of the Law of One being a "complete" system of study. When revising and augmenting those guidelines for the purpose of this forum, I initially amended that statement to eliminate the notion of the Law of One material being "complete", as no written or verbally communicated source of information can be "complete" in the conventional sense of the term.
The term would work if intended in the holographic sense in which the part contains the infinite whole. Otherwise, no matter the order of magnitude at which the material rocks, it can forever only serve as the finger pointing at the moon. (Though the Law of One material is in my opinion one of the few sources of information that actually points at the moon.)
With love and light,
GLB
Whether others agree with our justification is a different matter entirely.
The question I believe you intend to ask is, "To what extent does vilification distort the Law of One?" Or perhaps, "Is the act of vilification representative of the Law of One?"
To which I have this quote from the Law of One to offer for your consideration:
http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?ses...stion_id=4
Specifically, "We spoke to one who heard and understood and was in a position to decree the Law of One. However, the priests and peoples of that era quickly distorted our message, robbing it of the, shall we say, compassion with which unity is informed by its very nature. Since it contains all, it cannot abhor any."
This inability to "abhor" anything within creation is not an emotional acceptance, per se, though it may manifest as such, but is on a level provocatively expressed in the analogy of the mirror accepting (or not abhoring) that which passes before it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
And Jeremy, quick comment on your post. You said about the Law of One material that "[it] is so interesting that one could view it as more complete "map" than it actually is..."
I can see the evolution of your thought in this regard.
The Asc2k guidelines that you authored (which we used as a base to create the Bring4th guidelines) contained a statement along the lines of the Law of One being a "complete" system of study. When revising and augmenting those guidelines for the purpose of this forum, I initially amended that statement to eliminate the notion of the Law of One material being "complete", as no written or verbally communicated source of information can be "complete" in the conventional sense of the term.
The term would work if intended in the holographic sense in which the part contains the infinite whole. Otherwise, no matter the order of magnitude at which the material rocks, it can forever only serve as the finger pointing at the moon. (Though the Law of One material is in my opinion one of the few sources of information that actually points at the moon.)
With love and light,
GLB
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)