09-10-2020, 03:45 PM
(09-09-2020, 01:25 PM)Aion Wrote: Animals view all as the self, since in second-density they have not individuated or become self-aware as self and other-self yet.I think maybe such a nature should be idealized. When you look at a symbiotic relationship vs a competitive one, the symbiotic one is much more efficient, and doesn't create the entropy or suffering of the predatory/competitive relationship. When you look at the concept of zero point energy vs the concept of systems that need to consume some sort of fuel, they are again, much more efficient, and they are much more powerful. Predation, competition, and entropy are both inefficient, and create misery as a biproduct in 3d and higher/more aware 2d life. Maybe there needs to be some of this drag and adversity as catalyst for change, but it shouldn't be as oppressive and all-pervasive as it is, and ideally, its certainly the less beautiful, less efficient paradigm.
This sense of "us and them" is not there, when an interaction happens, it is all part of the ecosystem.
Quote:19.15 Questioner: Then the newest third-density beings who’ve just made the transition from second are still strongly biased towards self-service. There must be many other mechanisms to create an awareness of the possibility of service to others.
I am wondering, first— two things. I’m wondering about the mechanism and I am wondering when the split takes place where the entity is able to continue on the road towards service to self that will eventually take him to fourth or fifth density.
I would assume that an entity can continue— can start, say, in second density with service totally to self and continue right on through and just stay on what we would call the path of service to self and never ever be pulled over. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The second-density concept of serving self includes the serving of those associated with tribe or pack. This is not seen in second density as separation of self and other-self. All is seen as self since in some forms of second-density entities, if the tribe or pack becomes weakened, so does the entity within the tribe or pack.
The new or initial third-density entity has this innocent, shall we say, bias or distortion towards viewing those in the family, the society, as you would call, perhaps, country, as self. Thus though a distortion not helpful for progress in third density, it is without polarity.
The break becomes apparent when the entity perceives other-selves as other-selves and consciously determines to manipulate other-selves for the benefit of the self. This is the beginning of the road of which you speak.
Quote:20.4 Questioner: Then can you give me an example of an entity in third density that was just previously a second-density entity? What type of entity do they become here?
Ra: I am Ra. As a second-density entity returns as third-density for the beginning of this process of learning, the entity is equipped with the lowest, if you will so call these vibrational distortions, forms of third-density consciousness; that is, equipped with self-consciousness.
Quote:21.9 Questioner: Now, when the 75,000-year cycle started, [the] life span was approximately nine hundred years, average. What was the process and scheduling of— mechanism, shall I say, of reincarnation at that time, and how did the time in between incarnations into third-density physical apply to the growth of the mind/body/spirit complex?
Ra: I am Ra. This query is more complex than most. We shall begin. The incarnation pattern of the beginning third-density mind/body/spirit complex begins in darkness, for you may think or consider of your density as one of, as you may say, a sleep and a forgetting. This is the only plane of forgetting. It is necessary for the third-density entity to forget so that the mechanisms of confusion or free will may operate upon the newly individuated consciousness complex.
Thus, the beginning entity is one in all innocence oriented towards animalistic behavior using other-selves only as extensions of self for the preservation of the all-self. The entity becomes slowly aware that it has needs, shall we say, that are not animalistic; that is, that are useless for survival. These needs include: the need for companionship, the need for laughter, the need for beauty, the need to know the universe about it. These are the beginning needs.
As the incarnations begin to accumulate, further needs are discovered: the need to trade, the need to love, the need to be loved, the need to elevate animalistic behaviors to a more universal perspective.
During the first portion of third-density cycles, incarnations are automatic and occur rapidly upon the cessation of energy complex of the physical vehicle. There is small need to review or to heal the experiences of the incarnation. As, what you would call, the energy centers begin to be activated to a higher extent, more of the content of experience during incarnation deals with the lessons of love.
Thus the time, as you may understand it, between incarnations is lengthened to give appropriate attention to the review and the healing of experiences of the previous incarnation. At some point in third density, the green-ray energy center becomes activated and at that point incarnation ceases to be automatic.
The reason I have a hard time believing that nature has ever not been eating itself (cause really, most of the violence in nature revolves around food and survival) is because this even occurs on a microorganism level which were the first lifeforms to form on the planet. Even plants compete with eachother and can be aggressive towards eachother for the sake of survival.
Perhaps we are idealizing a nature in which there is never any competition?
That being said, I personally enjoy a little optional competition. There's nothing wrong with video games, martial arts sparring, sports, card games, and many activities that are voluntary forms of competition that provide mutual growth and enjoyment of a hobby. Those things can spice up life and provide growth, catalyst, and more appreciation and interaction with others. We should not have to compete just for the basics of survival, such as food, water, shelter, and health necessities. Maybe the 2d life forms on our planet are set up that way, maybe by original design, maybe by tampering, but they have a certain integrity when playing out that competitive nature in that they don't hate or take things personally, they just do what's necessary to survive by their design over which they don't have a choice.
3d is different, we have a choice. We largely design ourselves. He choose our own trajectory and ways of doing things, and to me, it's stupid to model ourselves after a competitive predator/prey paradigm when we can choose a superior symbiotic model that's more beautiful, more efficient, more powerful, and more full of joy rather than misery.