LOO rereading and there being 'only identity'

[Louisabell]

So the time has now come where I feel the desire to reread the LOO. I am excited about what I will find with my current world perspective and theory of mind. I can already tell that a big theme with this rereading is the concept of "identity", and I believe it is an important one.

Ra : I am Ra. The Law of One, though beyond the limitations of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only identity. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator.

What is it that we identify ourselves to be - consciously or subconsciously? What is the 'it' that identifies?

I also noticed this quote, which is perhaps once again another instance from Ra where on the face of it can appear needlessly verbose, but with greater clarity we may find great precision of meaning.

"1.5 Questioner: Could you give me a little more detail about your role with the Egyptians?
Ra: I am Ra. The identity of the vibration Ra is our identity. We as a group, or what you would call a social memory complex, made contact with..."

In a way Ra is saying "I am a portion of consciousness that identifies with the Ra identity". Can't argue with that!

With fragmented personalities, egos that cannot be satisfied and waring conflicting desires, we are constantly faced with the decision of what portions of self we prioritize and empower. Some portions can be empowered by their separation, such as unbridled rage, but the holistic self is empowered with the integration of all portions, even those unruly parts.

All living entities grow in the same way, first they seperate out into different parts and then they come together in an integrated whole.

Just some percolating ideas. Any thoughts? Anyone else into rereading the LOO after a few years to get a fresh perspective?