Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material LOO rereading and there being 'only identity'

    Thread: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity'


    Ymarsakar (Offline)

    Watcher
    Posts: 1,170
    Threads: 9
    Joined: Nov 2019
    #40
    09-22-2020, 02:10 PM (This post was last modified: 09-22-2020, 02:14 PM by Ymarsakar.)
    (09-22-2020, 01:27 PM)Diana Wrote:
    (09-21-2020, 09:03 AM)Ymarsakar Wrote: So what about new channels of information such as the Ra contact? It was made in the 1980s. If someone were to channel Ra again, such as Pamela Aaralyn, would this information be considered as legitimate as the 1980s?

    Humans tend to ascribe authority to old things. This obsession with the past, once again. The older they are, the "more authority and gravitas"!

    You are missing one point in this matter. It's trendy now to channel. This is one reason why something from "the past" seems, or actually is, more legitimate. I have self-help, spiritual-type books from the late 1800s and early-to-mid 1900s, which are so much more authentic and original than something one might read that was published in the last decade. Much of this stuff today is just repeating what someone else said—missing the power of true inspiration, and watered down with things such as what the market wants, demographics, and what will get hits on Youtube.

    As for the Ra Material, this was channeled before, or at the very beginning of the great wave of channeling and rhetoric in the "new age" movement, and therefore, to me, is more pure in both intent and content.

    The only thing I consider legitimate is tele empathic verification from the Divine Counsel. In the ever present, and eternal, Now.

    I covered that point extensively elsewhere, when I pointed out that humanity has been hacked at a root level. I would note that all these self help spiritual new age stuff, were all from the past.

    As for why they might feel more authentic, that is because of the way the game is played. The positive Confederation promotes information that will help polarize STO. The negative gets their turn and twists the information so that humans use it for STS, partially because humans themselves choose to use it for STS. The more humans involved, statistically, the more STS is mixed in. There was even a reinforcement of the dark matrix in 1996, the Congo invasion. This severed many psychic connections to the etheric or higher realms, allowing holograms to masquerade as guides and ascended teachers.

    The primary ability people need NOW, is the ability to discern what is true or not. So long as they do not have this ability nor do they seek to cultivate it, they are forced to rely upon the past memory, which is no replacement for the Divine Now. So long as they utilize this memory, the dark matrix can intervene and twist the purity of the information. Just as Ra's Pyramid was twisted through humans that were given promptings by the unHoly Spirit.

    If there is a holy spirit, then there is also an unholy spirit. Duality.

    As for concrete examples of how the Law of One is used for STS polarity, these forums are examples of both positive and negative incidences.

    There is nothing legitimate about the past. The past is not real. In fact, what you perceive as reality, is also not real but the past more than anything else, is unreal.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Louisabell - 09-17-2020, 11:44 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by flofrog - 09-18-2020, 12:08 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Louisabell - 09-18-2020, 07:37 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by flofrog - 09-18-2020, 04:31 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Patrick - 09-18-2020, 03:52 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Louisabell - 09-18-2020, 09:10 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by sunnysideup - 09-18-2020, 05:40 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Louisabell - 09-18-2020, 09:28 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Graemett - 09-18-2020, 07:25 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by flofrog - 09-18-2020, 09:40 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Sacred Fool - 09-19-2020, 01:42 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-19-2020, 01:55 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Sacred Fool - 09-19-2020, 08:25 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-19-2020, 10:36 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Patrick - 09-20-2020, 08:35 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-19-2020, 01:54 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Louisabell - 09-20-2020, 09:24 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by flofrog - 09-19-2020, 07:52 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Dtris - 09-19-2020, 11:05 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-20-2020, 09:35 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Sacred Fool - 09-20-2020, 11:07 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-20-2020, 12:41 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-20-2020, 12:54 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Sacred Fool - 09-20-2020, 01:40 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-20-2020, 02:11 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-20-2020, 06:07 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-20-2020, 11:52 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Louisabell - 09-21-2020, 01:00 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Ymarsakar - 09-21-2020, 08:50 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 09-21-2020, 07:56 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Sacred Fool - 09-22-2020, 12:57 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Louisabell - 09-22-2020, 04:57 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Patrick - 09-22-2020, 05:11 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Ymarsakar - 09-21-2020, 09:03 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Patrick - 09-21-2020, 11:35 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by flofrog - 09-21-2020, 12:41 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Ymarsakar - 09-21-2020, 01:34 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Diana - 09-22-2020, 01:27 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Ymarsakar - 09-22-2020, 02:10 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Patrick - 09-22-2020, 05:09 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Ymarsakar - 09-21-2020, 11:47 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Patrick - 09-21-2020, 01:21 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by flofrog - 09-21-2020, 01:51 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Ymarsakar - 09-22-2020, 02:16 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Ymarsakar - 09-22-2020, 05:21 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Glow - 12-30-2020, 05:30 PM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by Nau7ik - 12-31-2020, 09:40 AM
    RE: LOO rereading and there being 'only identity' - by unity100 - 01-07-2021, 07:34 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode