10-18-2020, 10:23 AM
(10-17-2020, 09:40 PM)peregrine Wrote:(10-17-2020, 08:25 PM)Diana Wrote: If you don't think it's sinister what religion has incited as far as violence, then I'm not sure you know history.
I don't believe the Latwii quote is sinister. I just don't see any real correspondence between it and historical Christianity.
I don't think I communicated very well. I didn't mean to suggest there was anything "sinister" in Latwii's words.
Ya know, I am pretty detached from the human drama. But I do like to philosophize and dig deeply into the nature of existence and I question things, because I don't just swallow anything that comes along. Not even the Ra Material. Which is why I brought this subject matter up. I don't have to "believe" any channeled material to get value out of it. But sometimes there are sticking points which stain the content, and to explore why is sometimes a thing I like to do. It still doesn't stop me from taking value from the content.
I do see a correspondence between Christianity and the wording of Latwii's message. It is perhaps the paradigm of the channeler coloring the language. If it isn't, then I take issue with the word "Father" because it makes no cosmic sense. Ra's "OIC" is less human-centric. So when listening to a channeled message with language that is questionable to me to that extent, on an issue of importance—abuse—I think it is valid to bring up these analyses.