The Law of Responsibility

[Confused]

In the process of this evolution, instead of reacting to the random catalyst generated by the logos, one consciously responds to and eventually generates their own catalyst. This involves, as others have mentioned in this thread, becoming increasingly conscious of ones experience.

Dear GLB, I came across a very interesting exchange in the LOO today, that at first sight seemed innocuous. But a more closer reading personally revealed, what I think to be an important insight. From the LOO -

82.4 Questioner: I would like to consider the condition at a time or position just prior to the beginning of this octave of experience. I am assuming that, just prior to the beginning of this octave, intelligent infinity had created and already experienced one or more previous octaves. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. You assume correctly. However, the phrase would more informatively read, infinite intelligence had experienced previous octaves.

Gary, please notice the very subtle semantic difference, but one that contains a grand truth if taken literally. Don says 'created and experienced', but Ra avoids 'created' and stresses on only experienced. Does that not tell us something about the 'law of responsibility'?

If the ONE is only the experiencer, then who is the creator? Let us ponder on that a bit

Does not then Ra's repeated reference to the semantic complex- 'One Infinite Creator'- take on a more significant meaning? We will consider one more verse -

13.5 Questioner: Thank you. Can you tell me of the first known thing in the creation?

Ra: I am Ra. The first known thing in the creation is infinity. The infinity is creation.

I join you in offering love and light to the ONE, and to all his sublime servants such as the entity we know as (master) Ra.

---

Or maybe he'd get a real job and distract himself with compulsive consumerism?

That is really humorous. Gave me a great laugh. Thank you for helping me smile, Peregrine.