02-08-2011, 09:27 AM
(02-08-2011, 04:18 AM)abridgetoofar Wrote:This is an interesting point. Maybe Ra made assumptions based on their own (composite/aggregate/collective) 3D experience of behavior? Probably not, as they can rapidly assess the evolutionary status of local consciousness. Presumably, they did see the 'probability vortices' presenting only a miniscule chance of success, but perhaps worthy of risk and effort due to a rather significant 'reward' if successful and balance-able distortion if unsuccessful.(02-06-2011, 01:41 PM)zenmaster Wrote: What's even funnier is how, presumably, 4D is infinitely more wise than 3D.
And, even with millions of years of evolution in consciousness beyond 3D, they would lack sufficient wisdom for what seems like an obvious ethical judgment call. Or perhaps 4D is not capable of (philosophically) more wisdom than 3D, or 3D is capable of more wisdom than 4D.
Ra made naive decisions, remember their work in Egypt? I'd imagine similar mistakes can be made by 4D complexes.