02-08-2011, 11:39 PM
(02-08-2011, 10:34 PM)zenmaster Wrote: of the harvestable entities being able to 'cut the line', only 54 percent of incarnate entities have reached the point of simply being able to make their own choices, after 75,000 years on Earth, and, for a great many, an additional thousands of years on 3D Mars. So maybe 125,000+ years?
One would think that disharmonious circumstances would offer a lot of catalyst, due to dissatisfaction. However, that does not seem to be the case. On the contrary, there must indeed be a lot of satisfaction present, on the whole. I wonder what reinforces that?
Presumably, the lack of polarization was due to lack of opportunity of some kind. From the material, it seems that lack of sufficient leisure time has a significant stifling effect on evolution.
One would think that difficult catalyst and the resulting dissatisfaction, as you mention, would prove sufficient motivation to initiate the conscious journey of polarization. Ra mentions somewhere about the efficacy of the two-by-four applied to the head.
But challenging catalyst seems not to be enough. Ra refers to the state of unpolarization on this planet as the "sinkhole of indifference" - emphasis (I would add) on the word "indifference". (Evidenced by the section you quoted wherein only 54% of entities can even make their own choices regarding incarnations.)
Ra also mentions that, "...the mind/body/spirit complexes of both individual and societies are scattered throughout the spectrum instead of becoming able to grasp the needle, shall we say, and point the compass in one direction." http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...tion_id=23
So if we are hunting for causes of this lack of polarization and slow evolutionary development, I think that these two statements provide leads.
1) Indifference
2) Lack of collective direction, common purpose, unity of desire
Maybe it is that confusion reigns so magnificently on this planet - such a multiplicity of truths in contradiction and conflict - that entities become apathetic?
But that wouldn't explain the whole story either because there are those of fundamentalist religious understanding who don't feel confused by multiple sources of information but remain steadfast in their certainty of what they believe are clear, distinct categories of right and wrong.
And there is also the case of the pre-Luciferian (so to speak) societies which, Ra said, existed in "monochrome" in which all was predestined, and thus were not availed the intensive opportunities for polarization.
So in short I would say, I don't know.
(02-08-2011, 10:34 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Presumably, the lack of polarization was due to lack of opportunity of some kind. From the material, it seems that lack of sufficient leisure time has a significant stifling effect on evolution.
This line of thought seems potentially fruitful. Someone on the forums should be able to take this ball and run with it. My brain is on empty right now.
: ) GLB
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi