Giants

[unity100]

that walking along refers to the annunaki incident in which the yahweh came to caanan and reproduced with earth entities through normal reproductive means to generate oversized human offspring.

Actually, this is not from the Ra teachings, so this is your own deduction.

im taking that you are referring to the caanan conclusion in regard to geography, for your objection. and not to whether incident in which yahweh has came in incarnated form in order to generate offspring to fight off negative societies. for, this is what we understand directly from the material.

This is again your own deduction.

it isnt ;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anak

it is a historical occurrence which took place after 2000 BC at the minimum - at the general date vicinity in which Ra had mentioned about the generation of oversized bodies by yahweh, and orion influence.

According to the Book of Numbers, during the conquest of Canaan by the Israelites, Anak (Heb. 'nq)(spelt as both ענק and as הענק depending upon the reference) was a well known figure, and a forefather of the Anakites[1][2] (Heb. Anakim) who have been considered "strong and tall," they were also said to have been a mixed race of giant people, descendants of the Nephilim (Numbers 13:33). The use of the word "nephilim" in this verse describes a crossbreed of God's sons and the daughters of man, as cited in (Genesis 6:1-2) and (Genesis 6:4). The text states that Anak was a Rephaite (Deuteronomy 2:11) and a son of Arba (Joshua 15:13). Etymologically, Anak means [long] neck[3].

so, this basically puts the anak at the time of moses.

had this been in egypt, there would be much more accounts of any existence of such extraordinary occurrence, be it yahweh, or the huge anaks they have produced as offspring, due to the tradition of egypt for recording anything of significance.

If we take your opinion of Canaan as a possibility, then everything I said above has even more merit, since Canaan is the same region, even closer:

Lastly, debating about the exact location where the Yahweh social memory complex from the Confederation "walked amongst us" 3600 years ago, is quite silly, since it's in the same general vicinity, which results in the same thing, that Yahweh's "walking amongst"

i think by this point i have established that caanan is not my opinion, but a historical occurrence, due to the freshness of the records dating from the era it happened.

in regard to 'same vicinity' in regard to geography, your approach is incorrect in that back in the standards of that day, what you call caanan and egypt, were worlds apart in all manners. entirely different cultures have sprung up and lived over distances like this. it was an age in which a journey with a galley from southern aegean to georgia was considered a legendary feat.

not to mention that, after freeing themselves from egyptian slavery, abrahamites settled in caanan. with your approach, they would have just went a few miles away from their oppressor, being totally meaningless.

but in reality, these regions were worlds apart in all respects. even at the point ramesses ii kept up to half of syria in egyptian control and kept a satrap there, there wasnt any kind of integration of the cultures, as evidenced by quick demise of egyptian rule.