Free Will Infringement, what is it?

[jafar]

From the most absolute perspective, there is only one person in the room.
As such violating other's free will is an impossibility, as there's no 'other' in the first place.
The free will is the free will of only that one person in the room.

Then that one person fractalized into parts, it still that one person but now in many parts / personalities.
Each parts inherit free will because the part and the one person is the same, but there is no way that the free will of the part will infringe the free will of the one person. As it means he's violating his own free will.

Thus the word 'free will' has multiple meaning depending on the 'zooming level' that we put as a context.

Using the metaphor of an orchestra, there is one person in the room who out of his own free will would like to have an orchestra-tic experience. He fractalized into parts, the music composer is a part, the conductor is another part, the violin players, the cello players, the horn, trumpet players and so on, even up to the audience who are enjoying the orchestra.

Zooming in to a violin player's part perspective, his fractalized free will is on which actual violin instrument to use, what angle to struck the string, what emotion he feels as he struck the notes etc.

He will not play different notes as it will violate the free will of the music composer, which is actually himself as well, yet as another part. Although he seems to have free will of many options to play which notes or even to play different instrument and not violin. But he will not do that as that will violate his own free will. He knew given the option of type of instrument he will eventually choose violin, and given the possibility of notes to play he will choose to play 'that' note as composed by the free will of the musical composer, which is actually himself as well.