Is 4D less or more dense than 3D?

[Asolsutsesvyl]

The problem here is you have to define what 'density' means in the chosen context. Obviously using the dimensions of mass over volume is not useful in this respect. So what are we defining? Information? Consciencnous? Experience?

That's exactly the problem. The word density is used alone, instead of making clear what kind of "density of ..." is meant.

Until it is made more clear what is meant, there are various things that cannot be answered in any conclusive way. The really big problem is that the D scale (I'll call it that) cannot be compared to anything else, to any other scale, with clarity. But this much is clear: It's an increasing scale of something. And for example, there may also be a corresponding decreasing scale of something else, which decreases when the D number increases, but what's that? You then have two unknowns, and you can't pin down what the second is without first doing it for the first.

On that note, it's exactly the same thing with "the light" vs. its absence, and also "lighter" vs. "heavier", etc., in many possible meanings in many spiritual usages. Usually, things without any definition are explained using things without any definition. I'm often in two minds about whether there's any point to any of this language or whether it's all meaningless rubbish.


While I criticize the Cassiopaean material in various contexts, on this topic I actually think it is an advance in clarity.

In the Cassiopaean cosmology, density refers to density of consciousness, which is inverse to density of materiality. Materiality is the result when consciousness "sleeps", in a particular sense. When consciousness is fully awaken, it is also fully undivided, and 7D is reached.

But what would provide a more vs. less dense "illusion" or experience, as Ra sometimes talks about? Less consciousness, i.e. a lower density of consciousness, on the one hand veils more, and makes more of the cosmos a matter of the external environment to which the being is subjected - but on the other hand it also limits the qualities of experience.

3D is described as particularly intense in how an individual being experiences things. Maybe above 3D, raw intensity of experience lessens, while more information instead becomes reflected in the experience, a higher information density then represented in the awareness, which translates into a qualitatively greater illusion. That could be how 4D provides a denser illusion, as Ra claimed.