Free Will Infringement, what is it?

[flofrog]

Sorry Minyatur, just out of curiosity, where did you see at the beginning that Ra quotes that they are not those of the Love or of the Light ? Just curious,

It's quite literally at the very beginning:

1.1 Questioner: It seems members of the Confederation have a specific purpose. Is this true with you, and if so, what is your purpose?

Ra: I am Ra. We communicate now. We, too, have our place. We are not those of the Love or of the Light. We are those who are of the Law of One. In our vibration the polarities are harmonized, the complexities are simplified, and the paradoxes have their solution. We are one. That is our nature and our purpose.

We are old upon your planet and have served with varying degrees of success in transmitting the Law of One, of Unity, of Singleness to your peoples. We have walked your earth. We have seen the faces of your peoples. This is not so with many of the entities of the Confederation. We found it was not efficacious. However, we then felt the great responsibility of staying in the capacity of removing the distortions and powers that had been given to the Law of One. We will continue in this until your, shall we say, cycle is appropriately ended. If not this one, then the next. We are not a part of time and, thus, are able to be with you in any of your times.

Does this give you enough information from which to extract our purpose, my brother?

To me the first session is where the material went somewhat off track from Ra's intent. If you take into account that their purpose with us truly lies in sharing the Law of One, then at question 7 in this same session they have asked Don if they have his permission to enunciate this law in more detail and in an inaudible manner they seem to have been denied the ability to do so.

So although a lot in the material resonates with the Love and the Light, I think this type of information being provided is more of a deviation of their original intent. Their purpose really was the Law of One, Unity and Singleness. Everything else I believe simply makes use of the exchange that was opened for that specific purpose at first but could deviate elsewhere by extension also. They did not want to control the exchange afterall, but they also did state their purpose clearly.

I'd love to know how they would have enunciated the Law of One in more details. That description already is my favorite part of the material and the one I believe is the most meaningful, yet what could have followed might've been even better. Oh well.

Oh right ...SO sorry I read it and managed to not see !!!! I am a dork