Is there a such thing as "good karma"?

[jafar]

I tend to agree with description of Karma as "Inertia"...

Yet in the context of 'inertial force' that keeps the 'fractalized consciousness' (soul) to 'come back' and experience something.
Thus there's an aspect of 'attachment' as well.

Regarding whether it's 'good' or 'bad', it's actually neither or both.
As 'good' and 'bad' are two sides of the same coin.

Taking an example of 'being wealthy' being labeled as a 'good karma'.
In absolute sense, the soul actually lacks nothing, yet once the soul witnessed or experienced certain condition which expose itself to a 'concept', it will create an 'attraction' of itself to experience such 'concept'.

It might be that the 'soul' has an 'attachment' or 'affinity' of experiencing 'being wealthy', and hoping to gain some lesson from experiencing such condition. In other words it's the 'attachment to being wealthy' that moves the soul to 'come back' and 'experiencing it'. Once the soul has experienced it and learn the lesson, the 'karma' of 'being wealthy' will be 'diminished'.

Becoming a 'billionaire' ain't no longer interesting once you've become a billionaire.
Yet witnessing a 'billionaire' while you're in 'poverty' condition yourself will create such desire / attraction / inertia to experience becoming a 'billionaire'.

Correlating it with 'attachment', this is where I think the concept of 'karma' meet the 'law of attraction'.
"attraction" is a form of 'attachment' and a form of 'karma'.
Curiosity is also a form of 'karma'.

And I think this is the 'reason' behind why Siddhartha advised 'non-attachment' to resolve 'karma'.
And the reason behind why Sadhguru mentioned 'enlightened' people actually have 'more karma' than the un-enlightened and not the other way around. As 'enlightened' people knows and being introduced to a wider range of 'concept' in comparison to the un-enlightened.