03-11-2021, 10:37 AM
Agua, I'm sorry if I am not directly addressing each sentences of each posts. I feel I am touching on the crux in my replies and do not know how to do a better job of it. I am not deliberately ignoring parts of a post. I do not quote the whole thing, but my replies normally applies to all the points raised. At least what I was able to perceive. Maybe Ymarsakar's evaluation is on target. 
Also, there are many avenues of discussions that are not within me to engage on. For example, I do not like discussing people or their intentions. I prefer by far discussing ideas.
I have been told many times that this can be frustrating for others. They want answers! Maybe they would even like a fight so to speak or a more heated debate. I'm not the person for this sort of thing. This service will have to be provided by others. It's not in me.
That being said, I will do a valiant effort in my next post. I will quote your post and try to answer all the parts. We'll see if this fits your expectations better. Let me know.
Also, there are many avenues of discussions that are not within me to engage on. For example, I do not like discussing people or their intentions. I prefer by far discussing ideas.
I have been told many times that this can be frustrating for others. They want answers! Maybe they would even like a fight so to speak or a more heated debate. I'm not the person for this sort of thing. This service will have to be provided by others. It's not in me.
That being said, I will do a valiant effort in my next post. I will quote your post and try to answer all the parts. We'll see if this fits your expectations better. Let me know.