Bring4th_Monica Wrote:Thank you for your apology, Spectrum!
Thank you, Bring4th_Monica.
Bring4th_Monica Wrote:We are discussing some deep issues here
That's is true, and this particular issue is the most sensitive issue on the planet, apparently there is a lot at stake.
It is impossible to piece together an objective truth as much as we are able to, if there are biases involved. It is however possible to do this in an atmosphere of goodwill, which isn't the case here. There are good intentioned people who are trying to "leave no stone unturned", with sincerity.
Bring4th_Monica Wrote:, some of which might be verifiable by historical and archaeological records, but even then, those records are subject to interpretation. One person might interpret the sky as green, while another interprets it as blue.
There is an objective truth, but it requires dedication, and leaving biases at the door. We are not the first people who have shown interest in this matter, there are many researchers who have laboured on this.
Bring4th_Monica Wrote:The fact that the vast majority of humans interpret the sky as blue doesn't make it blue, since majorities have been wrong before (like when they all thought the Earth was flat). We can all learn from the perspectives of others.
Remember what happened to those who proposed that the earth is round? They were considered heretics, because it contradicted the official doctrine of the day. I guess they were the conspiracy theorists / whistle blowers of the day, and to this day there are still those who say the earth is flat:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth_Society
Bring4th_Monica Wrote:As someone who is completely ignorant of history, I enjoyed the exchange and am still interested in the museum records of 'collossal' skeletons that you mentioned. After having seen Nassim's analysis of the elongated skulls, I find the subject fascinating. If you would be willing to post that, or pm me privately, I would appreciate it!
The colossal skeletal remains is an area of archaeology which is very sensitive, because it (together with other archaeological finds) contradicts the officially accepted doctrine of the day, the evolutionary theory being taught in schools around the world, that we are the descendants of apes, together with some other revelations which are not beneficial to 'certain interests'.
I have gathered material, which I will PM you. If you would take the time to read Forbidden Archaeology, http://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Archeolo...782&sr=8-1, you will see how the knowledge filtration works to preserve orthodox beliefs and bury contradictory evidence.
There are many covert, ‘not so good intentioned’ agendas at play:
Session 8, January 26, 1981 Wrote:Ra: I am Ra. The technology your peoples possess at this time is capable of
resolving each and every limitation which plagues your social memory
complex at this present nexus of experience. However, the concerns of some
of your beings with distortions towards what you would call powerful
energy cause these solutions to be withheld until the solutions are so needed
that those with the distortion can then become further distorted in the
direction of power.
Session 19, February 8, 1981 Wrote:Ra: I am Ra. We can speak only in metaphor. Some love the light. Some
love the darkness. It is a matter of the unique and infinitely various Creator
choosing and playing among its experiences as a child upon a picnic. Some
enjoy the picnic and find the sun beautiful, the food delicious, the games
refreshing, and glow with the joy of creation. Some find the night delicious,
their picnic being pain, difficulty, sufferings of others, and the examination
of the perversities of nature. These enjoy a different picnic.
All these experiences are available. It is the free will of each entity which
chooses the form of play, the form of pleasure.
I am still busy integrating the Ra teachings with other information I have gathered.
I am quite relieved to leave this thread, because all this hostility is not beneficial to my constitution.
Regarding the Hebrew bible, it is not very difficult to establish who the source of the 'divine inspiration' was. Eyes open!