04-12-2021, 02:13 AM
A.I. or bot will do exactly as they are instructed to.
A seeking missile is a form of an A.I, it's objective is to seek a target and approach it.
The 'intelligence' is merely an illusionary perception.
It would be interesting to read what GPT-3 able to produce in other languages, let's take Chinese or Swahili. And present it to the respective native speaker and ask about their perception whether the output shows any signs of 'intelligence' or not.
If the programmer method is putting the output from GPT-3 in English to Chinese or Swahili using Google Translate or other form of machine translation, then definitely the remarks from native speaker will be 'not intelligent at all'. As each language 'think' differently.
The results will be drastically different with let's say "channeling", where the 'fully conscious source' (not an A.I. or Bot) also have access to a set of memory residing in the 'channeler' thus Ra, Quo appeared to be a native speaker of the channeler's language. Although the 'choice of words' might be 'weird'. And we can easily tell that the source is indeed intelligent and not merely 'artificially intelligent'.
A seeking missile is a form of an A.I, it's objective is to seek a target and approach it.
The 'intelligence' is merely an illusionary perception.
It would be interesting to read what GPT-3 able to produce in other languages, let's take Chinese or Swahili. And present it to the respective native speaker and ask about their perception whether the output shows any signs of 'intelligence' or not.
If the programmer method is putting the output from GPT-3 in English to Chinese or Swahili using Google Translate or other form of machine translation, then definitely the remarks from native speaker will be 'not intelligent at all'. As each language 'think' differently.
The results will be drastically different with let's say "channeling", where the 'fully conscious source' (not an A.I. or Bot) also have access to a set of memory residing in the 'channeler' thus Ra, Quo appeared to be a native speaker of the channeler's language. Although the 'choice of words' might be 'weird'. And we can easily tell that the source is indeed intelligent and not merely 'artificially intelligent'.