This is like what happens in the bible. Some guy asks a question about a specific problem at that time, then the solution is transplaced 2000 years into the present and some human then tries to use unseen biases to interpret it to fit some modern context.
The only way to alleviate this is to constantly re ask the question in the now, which means having an open canon or what Jim was doing, which is to keep asking the questions. If they keep asking the question, there is always a chance or opportunity for the counter challenge to occur.
The reason transient information is not preferred is because
1. Carla's energies were not infinite
2. The fate, period of time, for the working was not infinite, due to Don
3. Time limited information degrades over time
Thus timeless information that does not change and always propels someone back towards source, is a better use of a high density entity's time. They don't like inefficiency. If they were inefficient, they would have been too lazy to get to the plateau they are at. Nor would they expend energy helping lesser forms, that are slow learners.
"Ra: I am Ra. We may comment on this.
49.4 Questioner: Well, please… will you go ahead and comment on it?"
This is likely why iamraw is being obtuse or reticent on purpose. Sometimes they will just take a topic and try to "push it" like the archetype issue. Other times their answers are shorter, almost like they are saying "this is not a good use of our time".
The only way to alleviate this is to constantly re ask the question in the now, which means having an open canon or what Jim was doing, which is to keep asking the questions. If they keep asking the question, there is always a chance or opportunity for the counter challenge to occur.
The reason transient information is not preferred is because
1. Carla's energies were not infinite
2. The fate, period of time, for the working was not infinite, due to Don
3. Time limited information degrades over time
Thus timeless information that does not change and always propels someone back towards source, is a better use of a high density entity's time. They don't like inefficiency. If they were inefficient, they would have been too lazy to get to the plateau they are at. Nor would they expend energy helping lesser forms, that are slow learners.
"Ra: I am Ra. We may comment on this.
49.4 Questioner: Well, please… will you go ahead and comment on it?"
This is likely why iamraw is being obtuse or reticent on purpose. Sometimes they will just take a topic and try to "push it" like the archetype issue. Other times their answers are shorter, almost like they are saying "this is not a good use of our time".