Are you going to take the vaccine?

[Minyatur]

I don't think this quote has anything to do with what you're making of it.

Reverting to the consideration of self and rejecting governmental and societal activities is more like this forum that closes its political sub-forum, or someone that does not vote and instead is focused upon his own life. You really can't equate someone that actively shares views about our societies and their government as having reverted to the orange ray, the orange ray is unconcerned with these things and would relate to seeking the self. This type of opposition is important and part of the balancing mechanism of society, again why someone reverting to the orange ray would not participate in them. It's easy to think about real life past events to illustrate this, think of any of the multiple genocides that have happened, and it is clear that operating from the yellow ray in moving towards the green ray does not mean blindly supporting your government and instead balancing society towards being more congruent with the green ray. Someone reverting to the orange ray will be minding their own things, neither supporting nor working against the events, because that would be a societal activity.

So long as people inherently believe that the vaccine is a danger to others, then the sharing of this information implies consideration for others. Now is it possible that this is imbued with red-ray fears and maybe unfounded? Perhaps, but it has nothing to do with the above quote.

I bolded the part above I wanted to respond to below.

I don't see activity in the rays as being dependent on content, inwhich you can say that someone reverting to orange ray wouldn't be concerned with politics at all. An entity reverting to orange-ray could be very concerned with politics, but always in reference to the self (i.e. what does a political policy change mean for me personally? or how can I protect myself from the political game? or how does the current political thought differ from my own personal opinions?, etc.)  I see true yellow-ray thinking as that which removes the "self" as the focal point, it can see the political structure for what it is and is willing to work along side it in order to achieve that which best serves the community (or not). In my interpretation, third-ray thought is predominately abstract as it must work with amorphous concepts such as "community" and "morality", but it must be done in conjunction with others in order for such thought-forms to be effectual on the group consciousness (i.e. influencing and instilling culture).

The true color yellow density is about self-awareness and realizing the self in relation to others. So an unblocked yellow ray is not about the self not being in the equation. It is about the self not being blocked in loving all those it is in relationship to, including itself. This is not really something that can be expected from anyone for the level from which they operate at the yellow ray.

As third-ray moves beyond the second-ray, considerations of personal bias must fall away, I can therefore see why Ra would say the following: The third blockage resembles most closely that which you have called ego (15.12). There's plenty of ego going around in politics, which is probably why so many of the population's needs are going unmet. We as a people are not fully utilizing STO third-ray effectively.

Except the quote you shared is exactly about someone working from the yellow ray. If we continue with what follows: Blockages in this center will often manifest as distortions towards power, manipulation, and other social behaviors concerning those close and those associated with the mind/body/spirit complex. While if you look at the quote regarding the orange ray it clearly states the exact opposite: This may not be seen to be of a negatively polarized nature, as the negatively polarized entity is working very intensively with the deepest manifestations of yellow-ray group energies, especially the manipulations of other-self for service to self.

So you may consider ego in politics part of the balancing of the yellow ray, not as having reverted to the orange ray. Someone who reverts to the orange ray is not polarizing, while someone working from the yellow ray can polarize both towards the positive or negative.

So, I interpret the above quote which Jade referenced (41.14) as though people are reaching out and wanting to love everyone unconditionally, they want to live in peace and harmony, but seeing the confused and mixed-polarity third-ray societal structures, have decided that the current society is unworkable, unsalvageable and beyond repair, and therefore there is a rejection of working with the systems as they are and there is a reversion back to the personal defenses found in orange-ray.

However, I am referencing subtle and complex movements, and you can absolutely not say where anyone is at from what "side" of the argument they fall on. Also many people have "rejected" the society as it were, but instead of being stuck in a defensive state against it, they have set up their own intentional communities. People have set up co-op farms, nature-based homeschooling, etc. They create their own groups which they feel fulfil their own needs and desires, and I also think this kind of activity has a lot of potential for a group of people to balance orange, yellow, then moving into green-ray in a dependable way together.

I do agree a lot of that does fit the quote. What does not though, is to include someone that actively tries to influence or alter society. This is not centered in the orange ray and was what I was commenting upon. Like I said, the quote does not say to reject government and society, it says to reject governmental and societal activities. There is a big difference between the two.