The most mysterious phrase of the Ra contact

[Dtris]

Many thanks Margan, Sena, Dtris, Anders, for your answers.
I would make the same answer for you four.

If I spoke of the "most mysterious" phrase of the Ra contact, it is because it seems to me that it goes beyond these notions of "inner polarity" well known today to seekers of truth. Jung spoke of the anima and the animus, with the process of individuation (inner balancing of the two poles), Rudolf Steiner the Anthroposopher said that the soul of man is feminine (and vice versa), and all spiritually evolved writers have always advanced theories on this subject, which seem to be able to be summed up by the symbol of ying and yang.

And when Ra says, too, that our polar dimension must be internalized, that each thought (of positive or negative charge) must be balanced by its "opposite equal", etc ..., let us note that he speaks here of the "mind" , as a fundamental part of the mind / body / spirit (MBS) complex. He speaks of the mind as Jung spoke of the mind, and as Steiner spoke of the mind (the soul for him). This is a well balanced "inner" polarity.

Whereas in this sentence (unless it was distorted by the interpreters, which would still surprise me a lot), it is very different. Ra speaks explicitly of each "biological" male and female, and therefore of a "physical" sex perfectly identified at birth, even if this biological sex is the result of a balancing of opposites "before" birth.

How should we understand this each "biological" male and female? Does he mean here only their gendered "body" or their MBS space-time complex?

Let us specify here all the same that, even when the interior polarity is balanced, the fact remains that it is the biological polarity which "decides" on the assignment to individuals of the "sexual" concepts of male and female. This implies, for all the authors cited, that even if there are different possibilities of balance of opposites (of the conscious and the unconscious) for each individual, it is the biological sex which "speaks last" to decide of the assignment to a sex.

So for example, it is an unconscious female mind (the potentialisator of the mind? the anima?) that will characterize the male, and an unconscious male mind that will characterize the female! Although for her, while I can speak easily of animus, I have the greatest difficulty in assigning to her a mind matrix (male character) to her male unconscious.

Now back to Ra. He does not say in this sentence that the body of each biological female has a counterpart in her male mind, and vice versa, etc. He speaks here of the sexual biological body as "the last (and first) decision maker of sex" , which constitutes its "Global Gender Identity" so to speak, and a priori, if I am correct, as a MBS complex.

And this is where the whole mystery of this sentence lies!

Where have we ever seen that we have a strict "biological" opposite, in the sense of a global gender identity?

Could it then be that, in "time-space", our Global Gender Identity as MBS, would be the opposite of space-time?

TLDR.

I am just going to state this for the record and posterity. Anyone who comes into a forum on any subject, and pretends to be asking a question only to get some answers so they can preach to everyone else about how everyone else was wrong and THIS is the right answer, is not a acting in good faith and I will personally ignore your posts henceforth.

That is not appropriate behavior for a discussion forum and it stiffles actual conversation since people will be reluctant to respond to new posters questions because no one likes "WeLl AkTuallEE".

You are the second person to do this recently and I am sure there will be more. Welcome to the forum.