10-06-2021, 12:22 PM
Hi Meadow-Foreigner!
Thank you so much for your feedback! I've been developing these concepts a lot over the past few days, and your feedback is exactly in tune with my findings so far! I've been making a lot of graphs to help myself and others visualize the movement which I'm trying to describe mathematically, as I've discovered even more symmetries than those currently in the paper! The image you attached is exceptionally helpful, as it almost exactly correlates to what I've been noting as Improbability fields, or the result of graphing the Impact of an object on Time, and I will definitely be exploring the similarities between these two figures!
Additionally, you're absolutely right that there is an issue with the semantics. I've only begun to learn about this by connecting one concept to the next, and they have a tendency to get jumbled at times. However, I am now in the habit of writing and filing my math and it's helped me to much more accurately analyze the movement of Energy through Time. I do focus on the central reference point being 1, however, I never clearly state it. The value i is ultimately the square root of negative one, and my equation for time is relative to G^0 which is equal to positive one, and I plan on further developing the Math so that I can eventually equate everything to 1. Now that Gravity can be defined relative to Energy, we can further study Gravity and define it's movement through Time more accurately since we know that that is equivalent to Impact! I plan on using the basic equivalencies from the current paper to build new one's that define properties of these dimensions, including properties of Gravity! These properties will ultimately boil down to being relative to 1 as they are simply properties of the definitive i!
My work can be condensed further! And it will be! The more I understand that which I am seeking, the better I am able to articulate it to myself and to others, and the more I am able to learn as a result! While I can define i as both the square root of negative one and the absence of Time, I think it makes more sense to break those into two separate things and prove their equivalence! The absence of Time is something that I am choosing to define as Consciousness, and I can then prove its existence to be imaginary in nature as it moves through Time. From there I think it will be easier to explain movement along a Wave Function since our terms are clearly defined as Consciousness moving through Time in a state of Imagination! I think that there is a lot to learn from this Math and I look forward to studying it!
Once again, thank you so much for your feedback! I find it exceptionally helpful and look forward to better understanding this Math as a result of it!
Thank you so much for your feedback! I've been developing these concepts a lot over the past few days, and your feedback is exactly in tune with my findings so far! I've been making a lot of graphs to help myself and others visualize the movement which I'm trying to describe mathematically, as I've discovered even more symmetries than those currently in the paper! The image you attached is exceptionally helpful, as it almost exactly correlates to what I've been noting as Improbability fields, or the result of graphing the Impact of an object on Time, and I will definitely be exploring the similarities between these two figures!
Additionally, you're absolutely right that there is an issue with the semantics. I've only begun to learn about this by connecting one concept to the next, and they have a tendency to get jumbled at times. However, I am now in the habit of writing and filing my math and it's helped me to much more accurately analyze the movement of Energy through Time. I do focus on the central reference point being 1, however, I never clearly state it. The value i is ultimately the square root of negative one, and my equation for time is relative to G^0 which is equal to positive one, and I plan on further developing the Math so that I can eventually equate everything to 1. Now that Gravity can be defined relative to Energy, we can further study Gravity and define it's movement through Time more accurately since we know that that is equivalent to Impact! I plan on using the basic equivalencies from the current paper to build new one's that define properties of these dimensions, including properties of Gravity! These properties will ultimately boil down to being relative to 1 as they are simply properties of the definitive i!
My work can be condensed further! And it will be! The more I understand that which I am seeking, the better I am able to articulate it to myself and to others, and the more I am able to learn as a result! While I can define i as both the square root of negative one and the absence of Time, I think it makes more sense to break those into two separate things and prove their equivalence! The absence of Time is something that I am choosing to define as Consciousness, and I can then prove its existence to be imaginary in nature as it moves through Time. From there I think it will be easier to explain movement along a Wave Function since our terms are clearly defined as Consciousness moving through Time in a state of Imagination! I think that there is a lot to learn from this Math and I look forward to studying it!
Once again, thank you so much for your feedback! I find it exceptionally helpful and look forward to better understanding this Math as a result of it!
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)