10-22-2021, 04:41 PM
One thing to keep in mind while discussing the STS vs STO paradigm in societal structures, is the graduation requirements.
51% STO
5% STS
What that means is that life in 3D starts at a baseline of some degree of STS when viewed in those ratios. This is seen in tribalism, warfare, in-group vs out-group, and other behaviors such as resource hoarding and automatic behaviors as mentioned.
This is one of the aspects of humanity that so many people today have trouble reconciling. How can people did horrible things be a hero to some? How can a person be a murderer and a savior? A leader and a despot?
The answer lies in where we start this journey and the way we view the world. Family is the original in-group, and we still see people worldwide who are loyal to family, even when that family does horrible things, over outsiders. You see groups who shun outside or institutional justice and prefer local in in-group justice.
Whether you are in-group or out-group has historically been a major determinant in how you were treated. Someone may be kind, giving, charitable, and regarded as a good person by their family, or country, or race, and at the same time do horrible things to people in the out-group, justified by protecting their in-group.
This is why the present day polarization is so harmful and many people are trying to stop it, unfortunately many efforts to do so get pigeonholed into the in or out group ideology.
What we see in history and present day behavior as STS, is often a larger representation of the in-group vs out-group bias, while STO behavior is largely reserved for in-group members, and depending on your own perspective can even appear to be STS oriented.
Despite this, according to Ra, we are going to have a larger portion of STO graduates at this end of cycle than STS. The disparity in this and the perception of STS social environment is at least partially due to the starting point being STS skewed, and the fact that the largest portion of people will be repeating the cycle in high likelihood.
51% STO
5% STS
What that means is that life in 3D starts at a baseline of some degree of STS when viewed in those ratios. This is seen in tribalism, warfare, in-group vs out-group, and other behaviors such as resource hoarding and automatic behaviors as mentioned.
This is one of the aspects of humanity that so many people today have trouble reconciling. How can people did horrible things be a hero to some? How can a person be a murderer and a savior? A leader and a despot?
The answer lies in where we start this journey and the way we view the world. Family is the original in-group, and we still see people worldwide who are loyal to family, even when that family does horrible things, over outsiders. You see groups who shun outside or institutional justice and prefer local in in-group justice.
Whether you are in-group or out-group has historically been a major determinant in how you were treated. Someone may be kind, giving, charitable, and regarded as a good person by their family, or country, or race, and at the same time do horrible things to people in the out-group, justified by protecting their in-group.
This is why the present day polarization is so harmful and many people are trying to stop it, unfortunately many efforts to do so get pigeonholed into the in or out group ideology.
What we see in history and present day behavior as STS, is often a larger representation of the in-group vs out-group bias, while STO behavior is largely reserved for in-group members, and depending on your own perspective can even appear to be STS oriented.
Despite this, according to Ra, we are going to have a larger portion of STO graduates at this end of cycle than STS. The disparity in this and the perception of STS social environment is at least partially due to the starting point being STS skewed, and the fact that the largest portion of people will be repeating the cycle in high likelihood.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)