(03-06-2011, 06:56 AM)BlatzAdict Wrote:Of course they can make decisions from info presented. But the info is presented in a leading, suggestive manner, and is composed of falsehoods. This is done on purpose, in order to promote a particular end. It is the manufacture and promotion of misleading or false information - false framing - for the sole purpose of inciting concern and awareness of something.(03-06-2011, 01:47 AM)zenmaster Wrote: "we may note the situation wherein an entity gets a road-map which is poorly marked and in fact is quite incorrect. The entity sets out to its destination. It wishes only to reach the point of destination but, becoming confused by the faulty authority and not knowing the territory through which it drives, it becomes hopelessly lost."
u say it like people can't decide for themselves whats wrong or what's right. isn't it better to have everything available and then let people come to their own conclusion instead of showing them only one side of everything.
This information does not exist on its own. It is, like all 'memes', 'intelligent energy' that directs or enables new choices of the same nature. Such info can only be spawned and further promoted, or given life, from an intention where ends justify means. This is wrong.
To put it another way, what kind of 'answer' (disclosure) does one expect from a satisfactory 'question' which is constructed of falsehoods? Of course the satisfactory answer to such as question can only be one which itself is a falsehood.
As far as I can tell, there is almost no virtue in that 'movement'. The 'form of the question doesn't matter as long as something I want happens' intention seems to represent the bulk of the popular motivation behind that style of promotion.