04-17-2022, 09:05 PM
(04-17-2022, 05:42 PM)meadow-foreigner Wrote:
- When you co-create, having as a perceptual focus the similarities existing in other-Selves, this is called positivity.
- When you co-create, having as a perceptual focus the differences existing in other-Selves, this is called negativity.
Negativity is a fallacy, for All That Is comes from the same fundamental premises, existing in all of Creation: Free Will, Logos, and Light. It is only when the Self mentally tunes into the lacks of the self in relation to others that one acts negatively.
This is why negativity (Service to Self) is a fallacy: the Infinitude that exists in the Self is dispensed with when one acts negatively, because one acts in terms of others, as a function of others, and as a distortion of the real value of the Self: Infinity, abundance.
While I think this is a useful framework. If you intend for this to be a comprehensive definition of positivity and negativity, or STS and STO, it is lacking.
Similarities and differences in self and other self, and the perceptual focus thereof, does not automatically mean your actions, words, thoughts, energy, will be negative or positive. An easy example is that a teacher, seeing the lack of wisdom, understanding, and knowledge in a child, engages in teach/learning with that child to serve the child in their incarnation. Mental focus is on the lack or differences in people, but the actions are STO and positive.
The whole argument comes across as if you worked backwards under the assumption that STS/negativity is a fallacy and tried to justify that conclusion. Could be wrong, just my impression.