03-28-2011, 05:07 AM
(03-27-2011, 11:22 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(03-27-2011, 04:43 PM)3DMonkey Wrote:I meant specifically, what does "learning" to SHIELD 4th density from third, have to do with loss of the magnetosphere? It seemed like there was something implied by that rather than a hypothesis.Quote:When 4D entities are "learning" to SHIELD 4th Density from third.
Implying? I'm only hypothsizing, not postulating.
Ra says during the time of Earth being unihabited 4D entities will be learning how to shield their density from third. I'm simply correlating that timeframe with another theoretical timeframe involving loss of magnetosphere.
More importantly, what are you thinking I am implying, zen?
I think the neat point of this idea is that a pole reversal isn't necessarily like the core of the planet shifting one way while the crust shift another. Or like the trick of pulling the tablecloth off and leaving the settings intact. This is how I've tended to imagine it.
Now, I can see it differently. Perhaps, more realistically. A pause of magnetic pole identity, then a new magnetic pole 'catches' at a new location. A child finds it easy to ask 'why is north north? What if the got it wrong and north was south the whole time?'
We really should trust child like innocence. Even a child would know better than to create nuclear waste. 'duh'