Ra's "photon" vs. electromagnetic radiation

[zenmaster]

EM spectrum is 1st density. It's the least complex form of light.

This leads to interesting thoughts because 8th and 1st density are intimately related. I wonder at what point the EM spectrum lies in the 1st density octave. If 8th and 1st blend into each other then perhaps it's actually at the mid point or even higher.

Don's referring to the Reciprocal System of Theory.

Right. I've not studied it much to know. Does Larson differentiate between typical photons and The Photon which the entirety of Creation is made of?

Larson posits that the photon is a manifestation of a vibration, or a displacement from unity of space and time (that he calls 'motion'). So motion is primary, not the photon. But the photon would be the most fundamental entity created from this space-time displacement. Larson's 'motion' is also not primarily vectorial (as in 3D cartesian), but scalar in nature.

Larson gets into some speculation about biological and ethical possibilities in the book 'Beyond Space and Time'. I suppose that could be considered to touch on 2nd-density and 3D-density. But Larson was careful not to overreach and actually didn't want the book to be published in his lifetime.

Yes. EM radiation is a "vibration" of the photon. I see time/space as non-local.

Ok, I guess I just find it funny that the photon can mean a very specific thing in science and something all encompassing in the the Larson/Ra use of the term.

Most of workable science is particle, field and forced based. Larson thought the RS model was more primary because it explained the origin of particles and forces (i.e. gravity).

Yeah, non-local it must be since there would only be 1 dimension of space. What I meant by 1d time/space being such a mystery to me is that it's incredibly hard to picture what it consists of.

In Larson's terminolgy space-time = time/space, and time-space = space/time.

What exactly is non-local energy?

Here's a physics professor's take on it: http://library.rstheory.org/articles/KVK...ality.html

I think the general idea here is that photons of the EM spectrum, though fundamental to lower density (1st-3rd/4th) dynamics, is only one part of the the full spectrum of the Light of Creation, and belongs somewhere in the 1st density octave.

Again, the EM spectrum (measurable radiation with frequency range) is only of 1st density. While 'motion' and 'light' (generic) are part of the entire creation.