04-04-2011, 07:14 AM
(04-04-2011, 03:19 AM)Ankh Wrote: Service to self is not equal to service to others from our point of view, that is 3D. Yet, RA tells that it is a dual method of saying the same thing, if one believes in Law of One of course. Balance of all thing inside the self, might be nothing else that full realisation of that you are all things, ei STO and STS, and I am going to be very surprised if I meet in 6/7D entities who went throught this whole creation without being both, at least at some point. But as you said, it is only speculations. RA also tell that meaning/purpose for many Wanderers incarnating in 3D is rapid progression towards the polarisation if they become awaken, which means that one needs to polarise. Honestly I was a bit dissapointed when I realised that part reading LOO. That there is nothing more to do/realise/be than just polarise. Service to others/or self - that's it, you graduate and you are out of here. I thought that it would be more.
you, i, are not 'all things'
conceptually being infinite in principle or inwards, does not make us in practice all things.
http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...=1&ss=1#23
Quote:.........These distortions remove the focus from the One Infinite Source of love and light of which we are all messengers, humble and knowing that we, of ourselves, are but the tiniest portion of the Creator, a small part of a magnificent entirety of infinite intelligence......
see how Ra describes themselves. a small part of a magnificent entirety of infinite intelligence.
so no, you and i and others are not 'all things' and can never be 'all things' by only their own self. its metaphorical, its a 'in-principle' proposition. there are more than one entity below infinite intelligence. there can never be one entity.
and from infinite intelligence and upwards, the word and concept 'one', 'single', 'many' lose their meaning. infinite intelligence is not one, or it is not many. it is also one and also many at the same time. the conceptualization that 'since there is only one infinite intelligence/infinity, it is one' only works from perspective of anything downwards from infinite intelligence. it becomes invalid at that level, because at that level there is both one, and there is both many.
the best approximation in this case would be 'we'.
you, me, others can only constitute infinite intelligence altogether.
combination of all existing entities forming a 'one' from finite perspective, but actually being a combination of many at the same time - this is infinity. the one/single and endlessly many combine to constitute infinite intelligence. exclude one 'many' from this infinite intelligence, and it wont be infinite anymore.
and even after that, there is still the route towards infinity, from infinite intelligence.