06-23-2009, 05:02 AM
Hello, my friend.
There is always the two paradoxes of freedom (it's these I've concluded so far, at least).
1. If all had freedom, one individual part of all is free to remove another's freedom, and as such there is no freedom while all has freedom.
This leads to 2. To exist is an infringement on freedom, yet one has to exist to acquire it as freedom denies the possibility of non-existence where there is no freedom.
Thus I think, to dwelve on the matter of leaving this place simple to gain freedom is a futile cause. Freedom is in your mind, as all things. The moment you realise that freedom does not matter, and that the feelings which causes this 'lack of freedom' can be denied, then you will be truly free, to do whatever you wish and feel whatever you wish, in my view of things!
(maybe this can be called the 3rd paradox of freedom...)
I wish you well in life, and when we meet again I look forward to hear what you've been doing.
There is always the two paradoxes of freedom (it's these I've concluded so far, at least).
1. If all had freedom, one individual part of all is free to remove another's freedom, and as such there is no freedom while all has freedom.
This leads to 2. To exist is an infringement on freedom, yet one has to exist to acquire it as freedom denies the possibility of non-existence where there is no freedom.
Thus I think, to dwelve on the matter of leaving this place simple to gain freedom is a futile cause. Freedom is in your mind, as all things. The moment you realise that freedom does not matter, and that the feelings which causes this 'lack of freedom' can be denied, then you will be truly free, to do whatever you wish and feel whatever you wish, in my view of things!
(maybe this can be called the 3rd paradox of freedom...)I wish you well in life, and when we meet again I look forward to hear what you've been doing.