Is there self-awareness in the octaves below

[unity100]

Unity..you know I personally have no issues with your style, and I am able to appreciate your wisdom/clarity.

I am simply using you correcting my simple passing statements as examples. People do not need their hands held. You need to let go of it being your duty to clarify every single point that is made. Perhaps it actually is your purpose to provide a certain amount of clarity, but loosen up! It is one thing to correct gross fundamental error, but there is also the necessity in being able to trust in another's ability to seek and understand. If kanonathena would have walked away from the thread without mention of octave wandering, his/her knowledge would have been unaffected. So instead of clarifying my post by telling me that I wrong (I purposely chose to lack clarity in that statement so I could generalize), just let it be...or say "It should also be mentioned..."

This is what makes a conversation pleasurable and facilitates the best possible learning experience. We give and take and play off of each other. Yes, we are here to clarify and understand the Law of One, but there are newcomers who will come here and encounter a stern, corrective figure that endlessly refines a person's statements without letting them go through their own process of learning. This is clarity without compassion for the seeker. We are all capable of properly seeking.

The student is trying to understand, but they also need support. Tell them they are wrong when they are, but do it gracefully. Because if you seek to provide clarity at the expense of understanding (love) their needs, not able to acknowledge that they are coming from a different place than you are, the message is lost. Instead they could develop a sense of unworthiness, feel unintelligent, experience public humiliation, and most importantly, they stop asking questions because they don't want to experience the former anymore.

This is the opposite of what you hope to achieve.

As you would say, this is unnecessary. Emotion shouldn't affect wisdom, I agree. But there are people here that will not able to get past these unnecessary stumbling blocks no matter how much you wish they could. Have compassion for their inability to not understand or be compatible with your level of communication. If you can't understand that people are different than you and we must blend our approaches, you're not being honest with the self. Not being honest with the self is also contrary to blue ray. There is more to blue ray communication than simply the information that is being conveyed. You are unable to see this as of yet and that's why it keeps getting reflected back to you.

There are those that need a different approach.

It is helpful to contemplate that misunderstanding is ok. All will eventually be clarified. I use to have the desire to communicate wisdom above all else, until I realized they were starting to tune me out.

you are providing various valid reasons for what argument you are making, according to the current understandings and behavior patterns of the society we are in. in their context, these are valid.

however, the stark requirement of working past green ray, but especially indigo ray is, radiation of self regardless of any actions from the others.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...=1&ss=1#24

it starts with blue.

this is apparently nature and requirement of blue ray and its understanding, (in positive path). and since it is a density/ray property, regardless of the reasons provided for not doing so and the means that it is not done, if an entity is not directly, openly honest to other entities regardless of any actions from others, it will not fulfill the requirements of blue ray.

this is a requirement even for the negative path, since progression after a point in 6d requires honesty - entities going past toward early 6 d will have to attained that level of honesty and expression, regardless of the path they have come there from.