What would you do as a Logos?

[Bring4th_Austin]

Not to cast doubt nor support the information put forth in the Helping_Hand sessions (referenced by hogey11), but in it Yahweh was described as a "sub-sub-logos," and if I recall the information correctly, the description seemed to fit that of a Guardian group.

I have no opinion or stance on the material, but I remember the description of Yahweh fitting that put forth by Ra and Q'uo. This is if my memory is serving me correctly.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?search_...&ss=1&sc=1

any entity walking on this planet are also named 'sub-sub logos'. with that logic, a 3d entity would also be a guardian. or any group on this planet, or another, a guardian group.


i wasnt able to find the part yahweh being dubbed sub-sub-logos either, as a sidenote.

Yes, I understand the term "sub-sub logos" could refer to a 3D entity. Travelling down the logoi chain, we might even call 3D entities sub-sub-sub logoi. Ra pointed out that just adding "sub" as you travel down the logoi chain is a careless use of grammar.

The point being, Yahweh had more of a hand in creating our 3D experience (through the DNA alteration) than other outside sources. Speculating the channeler held slightly different concepts of logoi than presented in the Ra material, applying the label of logos to Yahweh doesn't seem that far of a stretch for me.

Here's the actual quote from the Helping_Hand stuff.

Your Creator, the one you have called 'Yahweh', is not "God" inasmuch as your bible refers to him as being "the One True God". He is 'a' Creator (or Sub-Sub-Logos) rather than the One Infinite Creator. He is not even a Galactic level Logos, but rather, is the Planetary Logos for this one planet.

Again, speculation that the description of "Planetary Logos" isn't consistent (and isn't meant to be consistent) with the Ra material.



I reassert my neutral stance on this material. I just want to make sure all parties know what is being discussed without misconceptions.