04-29-2011, 11:10 PM
(04-29-2011, 09:22 PM)Azrael Wrote: I think the words making up the concepts "Service to self" and "service to other-self" to be quite a redundancy. It is clearly stated by Ra that both paths help both sides, they are simply identifiers for those whom desire of such things. Our language very much limits our capacity to fully grasp the nature of the two paths, if indeed two is all there are. What about those who do service to no one? Does that default to themselves or make them automatically STS? Are the paths a matter of karma or is there some other need for separating behavioral habits into two categories of morality? Is it really nothing more than a decision of what role to play? Is there significance in one or the other, or like in the nature of some ideas, does every possibility get played out in some alternate stream of time?
This all comes down to, is there really any other point for the universe to exist besides the fact that it's excruciatingly interesting and exciting? Does there need to be any other point?
(is this the sts vs sto thread
)For some reason 4D requires the separation. Ironically, separation to promote unification. Don't both sides in 4 density exist to balance the other. What is in our singularity in 3D, our internal potential for polarity, is likened to the 4D complexes in the larger realm. A polarized thing is something that has separated the positive charges from the negative charges. It would make total sense that if I managed to become 90 % STO, that somebody else in the universe would correspondingly become 90% STS.