(06-03-2011, 09:20 AM)zenmaster Wrote: How can there be 'no mistakes', yet then an identification of 'mistakes'? Sounds like Ra's reluctant use of 3D 'understanding'.
Yeah, just cutting away "mistakes" kind of removes a huge part of "responsibility" as well. Sure, this is mainly just semantics... but, really, obviously, sometimes what you do comes with a negative effect, and if it wasn't intentionally done so, it for sure was a mistake.
Unless you're STS and lucky (since not being in control is kind of counter to what STS stands for.)
(06-03-2011, 08:52 AM)3DMonkey Wrote: Ra bowed out because it wasn't resonating with their intentions
Not sure what you imply by that, but, Ra did stay around - to try to fix and amend what it messed up in the first place. Taking responsibility for the mistake it did.