06-04-2011, 12:16 AM
(06-03-2011, 11:29 PM)Raman Wrote:(06-03-2011, 10:31 AM)unity100 Wrote: i wouldnt trust q'uo channelings (or any channeling that is done in conscious manner that is) that much. i have been told some of the pieces are quite colored by the perceptions of whomever channeled them at that point.
That is the problem I see many times in this forum... many treat the quo channelings to be as reliable as Ra's just because Carla is involved at times ,etc...
I honestly must say that there could be some validity on those channelings just because Carla has experience with channelings. However, you cannot compare Ra's channelings with Q'uo's. For example I must say that if David Wilcock is saying " I am channeling Ra now..." i m sorry i must say "zero probabilities" with q'uo maybe a little higher...not enough for me though.
It is hard enough to put together the immense amount of information in the Ra material.
To me this is the only reliable material so far, and it took me a few tries to discern if I could trust the source..but then there were very incredible moments where i felt deep inside that "Carla could not have made this up, even unconsciously --not realizing it--although the validity is there due to being unconscious...
I do not think it matters that it is 30 years old.
What is "the problem"?
The irony here is that Ra doesn't suggest that we seek them but to seek our self and our higher self. I would suggest we trust that MORE THAN Ra.