06-10-2011, 11:57 PM
(06-10-2011, 10:19 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(06-10-2011, 10:17 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: To assume Ra was confirming the statement before the question is, well, assumption.Exactly, and no doubt we have formed our opinions from somewhere. Would be good, especially if we have convinced ourselves of an idea, to share how they were formed.
I have never pondered this passage before. I had sort of a knee jerk reaction to the idea of structures and other "artifacts" being destroyed or wiped out because of a previous opinion on how the transition will go. I've been pondering the artifact passage all night and can't say I've gotten anywhere. I honestly don't think enough context was given for me to fully form an opinion. I think my opinion on how the transition will go still stands.
(06-10-2011, 10:23 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: If I were to be openly honest, I'd say I am not convinced of anything. This is difficult to admit because I fear automatic rejection for saying so.
Come back when you have an opinion sir

(06-10-2011, 10:40 PM)Raman Wrote: I think we should keep an open mind. I see relevance in that Ra did not contradict Don but added artifacts, thoughts, etc produced by 3d entities. It is very clear what is potentiated and what is activated. There is no need to play complicated games with this. Ideas are formed all the time. Some have more difficulty opening up to new ideas others less.
Ra did not explicitly state what would go into potentiation. They did not even mention potentiation. They only spoke about what was part of our 3D sphere at this time.
==================
Maybe, as we manifest 4th Density into space/time, this will include (re)manifesting these artifacts into 4th Density. The only thing that makes the artifacts more than 1D material is our perception and use of them as 3D tools. Obviously, when we are 4D, we will no longer use them in a 3D manner, and they will become 4D artifacts. The artifacts we don't use will no longer be 3D artifacts, but just left-over 1D material from our 3D existence.
I think that explanation jives with me.
_____________________________
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.