06-11-2011, 04:20 PM
(06-11-2011, 02:14 PM)abridgetoofar Wrote:(06-11-2011, 09:52 AM)unity100 Wrote: most of them, dubious and questionable. and what quo says. it is also quite questionable since it is conscious channeling.
Honestly, I am equally as skeptical of ANY information transmitted in the Ra contact that is not of spiritual nature, including things about people (Jesus, MLK, etc.), history (Atlantis, etc.), the pyramids, and all. Their descriptions of oneness, unity, Service to Others vs. Service to self, polarity, and the nature of consciousness is pretty indisputable, but I don't buy every bit of the information. I discuss it with loyalty to the material on this forum because that is one of the main purposes of this forum, but candidly, I trust Q'uo as much as Ra, and neither do I trust completely. When we start dismissing consciously channeled material simply due to the method of delivery, then I will just as ready dismiss all material in the Ra contact aside from philosophical and spiritual concepts (for example, information on harvest, ETs, science-minded metaphysics, densities, etc. I would dismiss)
Why do you put so much faith into the Ra contact, aside from the fact that it was channeled in "trance?"
it was a meticulous and dangerous form of out of body trance. moreover, and more importantly, information and systems given in the whole of material constitute a whole which you can start from any end, and eventually arrive at another end without breaking.
the real feature that validates this whole of information is that, it can be verified in multiple aspects. and due to interconnectedness, this validates a lot of other info in the chain directly.