3D to 4D: Sudden or Gradual? A great read...(David Wilcock interview)

[3DMonkey]

ra says intelligent infinity offers a type of clock. not 'something like a clock' or 'an analogy of a clock'.

it was said that, the gateway to intelligent infinity opens regardless of the striking of the hour.

it doesnt have to be 60 seconds, but it can be 60 seconds. it doesnt have to be a day, it can be a few days.

however it cant be decades. a decades long happening, is a 'process', and it cannot be said to 'happen' at a certain year (circa 2011), like Ra said, in our context, in response to a question in OUR time of reference.

moreover, if such an event was years long, it would be possible to do an immense array of things in the process, since gateway to intelligent infinity will be open for that duration.

You are mixing different things here that have no direct linkage.

First, the quote is this:
9.3 Questioner: The way that I understand the process of evolution is that our planetary population has a certain amount of time to progress. This is generally divided into three 25,000-year cycles. At the end of 75,000 years the planet progresses itself. What caused this situation to come about with the preciseness of the years in each cycle?
Ra: I am Ra. Visualize, if you will, the particular energy which, outward flowing and inward coagulating, formed the tiny realm of the creation governed by your Council of Saturn. Continue seeing the rhythm of this process. The living flow creates a rhythm which is as inevitable as one of your timepieces. Each of your planetary entities began the first cycle when the energy nexus was able in that environment to support such mind/body experiences. Thus, each of your planetary entities is on a different cyclical schedule as you might call it. The timing of these cycles is a measurement equal to a portion of intelligent energy.

This intelligent energy offers a type of clock. The cycles move as precisely as a clock strikes your hour. Thus, the gateway from intelligent energy to intelligent infinity opens regardless of circumstance on the striking of the hour.

13.23 Questioner: How does a third-density planet become a fourth density planet?
Ra: I am Ra. This will be the last full question.

The fourth density is, as we have said, as regularized in its approach as the striking of a clock upon the hour. The space/time of your solar system has enabled this planetary sphere to spiral into space/time of a different vibrational configuration. This causes the planetary sphere to be able to be molded by these new distortions.
More precisely, the analogy is presented in the form of simile, a figure of speech involving the comparison of one thing with another thing of a different kind, used to make a description more emphatic or vivid.

Second, it is "regardless of circumstance", and "on the striking of the hour" is still within the analogous description.

Third, the quote is this:
17.29 Questioner: Am I to understand that the harvest is to occur in the year 2011, or will it be spread out?
Ra: I am Ra. This is an approximation. We have stated we have difficulty with your time/space. This is an appropriate probable/possible time/space nexus for harvest. Those who are not in incarnation at this time will be included in the harvest.
"To occur" literally means that the set of conditions known as harvest will be present in 2011. "Appropriate nexus" literally means the connection between 2011 and harvest can be made. Nothing of these literally means that the entire act of harvest will begin and finish within a year, a probable year of 2011.
The idea that "happen" can not be "process" is unfounded. A hypothetical time frame of a 199 year harvest-process literally has harvest "happen" every day of the "process."

---

61.9 Questioner: This brings out the point of the purpose of the physical incarnation, I believe. And that is to reach a conviction through your own thought processes as to a solution to problems and understandings in a totally free situation with no proof at all or anything that you would consider proof, proof being a very poor word in itself. Can you expand on my concept?

Ra: I am Ra. Your opinion is an eloquent one although somewhat confused in its connections between the freedom expressed by subjective knowing and the freedom expressed by subjective acceptance. There is a significant distinction between the two.

This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other in-pourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.

That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third-density.

Here's the thing. Each one of us, depending on the nature of our bias, arrives at this acceptance in a unique manner. The acceptance is the 'ownership' of the logos. If it's 'mystery' shrouding that causes acceptance, than so be it.

Choice quote. It covers multiple discussions going on in this one thread. (I love that, by the way.)

The funny thing about it is that you must believe the source of the quote, then the quote itself, then reapply the quote back unto itself, and then repeat. 'sounds right' 'is it true' 'let me apply what it says' 'sounds made up' 'is it true' 'let me apply what it say' 'sounds okay' 'is it real' 'let me try it out' , etc.