06-12-2011, 12:15 PM
(06-11-2011, 08:15 PM)zenmaster Wrote:Quote:61.9 Questioner: This brings out the point of the purpose of the physical incarnation, I believe. And that is to reach a conviction through your own thought processes as to a solution to problems and understandings in a totally free situation with no proof at all or anything that you would consider proof, proof being a very poor word in itself. Can you expand on my concept?Here's the thing. Each one of us, depending on the nature of our bias, arrives at this acceptance in a unique manner. The acceptance is the 'ownership' of the logos. If it's 'mystery' shrouding that causes acceptance, than so be it.
Ra: I am Ra. Your opinion is an eloquent one although somewhat confused in its connections between the freedom expressed by subjective knowing and the freedom expressed by subjective acceptance. There is a significant distinction between the two.
This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other in-pourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.
That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third-density.
That quote is right on the mark.
Seeking for proof is a necessity in 3d, (space-time/time-space) but is it ever definitive? No, since 3d is not a density of understanding since it is an illusion...directly related to the sub-Logos. Even Ra talks about possibilities/probabilities always tied up with time.
It seems that starting in 4d the true nature of the sub-Logos is unveiled.