06-12-2011, 12:48 PM
The phenomenal realm 'functions derived from principles of being' or 'the finger pointing at the moon' (3D) and catalyst vs the underlying noumenal realm or 'principles of being' Kant's 'Ding an sich' (4D), with no catalyst.
The progression of individuation within 3D is the same way. Moving from the preliminary learning of the basics of the self, including how one thinks (the biases), to simply 'being', after a certain amount of self acceptance.
With the acceptance, much of the catalytic opportunities of 3D are not as useful to evolution on the whole - and may just offer 'fine tuning'. And without a certain degree of acceptance, the principles of 4D are not useful to evolution. The higher self and, after a certain amount of 3D experience, even the 3D time/space self simply sees what next incarnation would be most useful for evolution. We are 'harvested' where we would have the most potential to evolve, anything less would not be 'serving the creator'.
The progression of individuation within 3D is the same way. Moving from the preliminary learning of the basics of the self, including how one thinks (the biases), to simply 'being', after a certain amount of self acceptance.
With the acceptance, much of the catalytic opportunities of 3D are not as useful to evolution on the whole - and may just offer 'fine tuning'. And without a certain degree of acceptance, the principles of 4D are not useful to evolution. The higher self and, after a certain amount of 3D experience, even the 3D time/space self simply sees what next incarnation would be most useful for evolution. We are 'harvested' where we would have the most potential to evolve, anything less would not be 'serving the creator'.