Fukusjima

[unity100]

Once it's clear what one's responsibility is, then yes.

it is always the entity's responsibility. thats why choice exists.

What's not black-and-white is defining that responsibility. Real-life situations aren't black-and-white. They're complex.

according to law of responsibility, if you had aided a negative effort, you had aided a negative effort. your justifications and reasons and excuses and whatnot, would not change that. the inertia created with that act, will keep going until offset through any means.

That's not to say anyone should judge anyone else. We might think another person made a poor choice, but we cannot really know, without being in that situation ourselves. For example, it would be wrong for me, who has a husband, to judge the choices of a poor, single mother. I can't know how her struggles might be different from my own. Or someone with no children to support, to judge someone with children. The game changes when one is responsible for others. It's much more complex, when children are involved.

it is not complex at all. regardless of circumstances, law of responsibility will act.

billions of entities had innumerable justifiable reasons for what they did in regard to money system, trading, ownership systems since the start of second cycle. did any of those justifications, causes, excuses prevent the ENTIRE planetary population's lifespan from getting permanently shortened ? nay.

In the conventional corporate structure, you're probably right. However, new companies are being formed, with new structures, that empower their distributors, rather than feeding the shareholders. Network marketing and direct sales companies utilize a new, cutting-edge marketing structure that largely eliminates the dog-eat-dog, back-stabbing aspect. They are based on the concept of cooperation instead of competition.

the system acting against individuals in the corporate world is no different from the system acting against corporations in the corporate world, if you consider corporations as individuals.

those corporations which are more dastardly, will work with equally dastardly corporations, and either consume or put down corporations that are not like them. this may happen through any means.

Hence, I'd agree that it's very difficult, and maybe even nearly impossible, but I wouldn't say it's impossible. There are exceptions.

can you name just one exception ?

Or actual bodily assassinations!

that was the thing of earlier decades, like at least 30 years ago. character assassinations are questioned less than real assassinations, and seems to be the order of the day since a while.