01-08-2009, 11:02 PM
Thank you Steve, for sharing your thoughts. I love hearing about how others think on these matters. I think you raise an excellent point about how entities can slip through the back door, so to speak, and replace with entity that you think you're communicating with. It can get pretty confusing, which merits the extreme caution. There's yet another channeler that I've read who has successfully predicted earthquakes which would seem to earn them credibility. However there is a vast amount of other things that have not come to pass as predicted. I presume that this was just due to the future being not set, i.e. ever changing possibilities. But who can say for sure, it may easily just be a negative agenda. I'm still not quite sure how I think about those sources, but one thing I can say for sure now is that any "literal" or earthly / material predictions that I hear about I will certainly take with a critical eye. I agree that it would make the most sense for the philosophical and spiritual information to have the most truth. And I daresay the most important for us to hear.
I'm very happy to hear that Carla screens every session with a prayer and challenge for the entity to pass. Whether there is interpretation or not, this is enough to satisfy me. My question actually stems from something I read by David Wilcock, where he was making the argument about the transition from 3rd to 4th density as being instantaneous (instead of gradual). He was addressing the fact that that idea was dismissed in the Q'uo sessions, and his response was that Carla herself has always been against the notion of such a fast shift. So in effect he was saying that we shouldn't hold the Q'uo material on the same level as the Ra material because of the way those two entities are channeled. But, using my 'radar' intuition, I don't feel that he's quite right about that. The information 'feels' genuine and undistorted. But even so, on a purely logical basis I am willing to accept that we are hearing the information with the words that she chooses to use, but I can't believe that Q'uo would continue the transmission if he/she/they were bearing witness to such a large distortion of their meaning.
I'm very happy to hear that Carla screens every session with a prayer and challenge for the entity to pass. Whether there is interpretation or not, this is enough to satisfy me. My question actually stems from something I read by David Wilcock, where he was making the argument about the transition from 3rd to 4th density as being instantaneous (instead of gradual). He was addressing the fact that that idea was dismissed in the Q'uo sessions, and his response was that Carla herself has always been against the notion of such a fast shift. So in effect he was saying that we shouldn't hold the Q'uo material on the same level as the Ra material because of the way those two entities are channeled. But, using my 'radar' intuition, I don't feel that he's quite right about that. The information 'feels' genuine and undistorted. But even so, on a purely logical basis I am willing to accept that we are hearing the information with the words that she chooses to use, but I can't believe that Q'uo would continue the transmission if he/she/they were bearing witness to such a large distortion of their meaning.