Fukusjima

[unity100]

Am I understanding you correctly that green needs to be only 1% open? I am very surprised by this! That is totally not how I understand it! My understanding is that green must be 51% open for STO harvest.

With only 1% open, STO/STS would lose their meaning.

you are forgetting that choice, what determines sto/sts, is related to yellow ray. and at the end of that ray's density, the choice is determined.

I didn't say anything about late 3D. I said individuation must occur in (late) 2D, in order to be harvested from 2D into 3D.

quite. however, we are currently in late 3d. and therefore, the behavior you have expressed can not be shown as something pertaining and natural to this d, leave aside the harvest.

What I mean is, there is a reason that we have family structures on this planet. It was designed to facilitate caring for others, with the idea being that, as one learns to love those close to him/her, the s/he can start expanding that love to others outside the family circle.

was it designed ? i didnt see anything in regard to that in Ra material. it may be from other sources.

With this planet so behind, it was probably decided that expecting the 3D entities to love others equally was too advanced, so starting with loving families was a way to progress towards the eventual goal of loving all.

or the family concept remained from 2d, as a form of orange ray identification.

Because this entire game we play, is to facilitate our spiritual evolution. Thus, it seems reasonable to me that our awareness and intentions would be factors in how the cosmic laws are applied to us.

we are talking about base mechanics of existence, like action-reaction, light traveling in a straight line and so on. intention is not a factor in these. intention can be a factor in the interactions of entities with each other.

a good example is despite being totally isolated from the effects of what he did, and its intentions great, the entity walking in to abraham lincoln to facilitate emancipation losing some polarity due to entities losing their lives in the civil war.

Are you saying that cats incur karma when they kill birds?

any action has consequences.

But again getting back to my point, I don't think a cat incurs as much karma when he kills a bird, as a human does when he kills a bird. There is an increase in responsibility, corresponding to the increase in awareness. I'm quite certain I read that in the Law of One, somewhere.

again, i am not talking about karma as in known in our spiritual literature.

its a simple principle - every action has a reaction.

that mother is free to choose how to handle her responsibility. however, even if intentions and situations may change the response of higher self, complex totality, or social memory complex or its totality towards her act, law of responsibility will still act indiscriminately.

Yes, but do you see that the law of responsibility will also act on her irresponsible behavior in neglecting her children?

yes it will.

That is just trading one irresponsible act for another (and a much greater irresponsible act, in my opinion). I guess what I'm hung up on is your view that she should immediately quit her job. Or did I misunderstand you?

what she does, is her choice. as i mentioned, law of responsibility will act on her in both choices.

Ah. I will clarify what I mean by multinational.

The official definition is as you described: A company doing business in other countries, with a home base in some country, and branches in other countries.

But in practice, today's multinational corporations are so huge that they have no allegiance to any country. They exist outside of any national boundaries.

yesterday's multinationals were not too different. east india company single handedly occupied and colonized india until late 18th century, when the crown took over. it was basically a private company until then.

companies spanning oceans were affecting politics in every country, just like how they do today. in a sense, nothing was too different.